Pubdate: Sat, 03 Mar 2001
Source: Time Magazine (US)
Copyright: 2001 Time Inc
Contact:  Time Magazine Letters, Time & Life Bldg., Rockefeller Center, NY, 
NY 10020
Fax: (212) 522-8949
Website: http://www.time.com/time/
Author: Jessica Reaves

JUST SAY NO TO DARE

After Years Of Ignoring The Program's Failure, DARE's Anti-drug Mavens 
Design A New Curriculum For A New Generation Of Teenagers

Here's a news flash: "Just Say No" is not an effective anti-drug message. 
And neither are Barney-style self-esteem mantras.

While most Americans won't be stunned by these revelations, they've 
apparently taken a few DARE officials by surprise. According to the New 
York Times, after years of ignoring stubbornly low success rates, 
coordinators of the 18-year-old Drug Abuse Resistance Education program are 
finally coming around to the news that their plan to keep kids off drugs 
just isn't working. That means a whole new DARE program - one which critics 
hope will sidestep existing pitfalls.

An ineffective past DARE, which is taught by friendly policemen in 75 
percent of the nation's school districts, has been plagued by image 
problems from the beginning, when it first latched on to Nancy Reagan's 
relentlessly sunny and perversely simplistic "Just say No" campaign. The 
program's goals include teaching kids creative ways to say "no" to drugs, 
while simultaneously bolstering their self-esteem (which DARE founders 
insist is related to lower rates of drug use). It's apparently not a bad 
way of educating five-year-olds about the dangers of drinking cleaning 
fluid. But it's a bust at keeping teenagers from smoking pot.

According to an article published in the August 1999 issue of the Journal 
of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, DARE not only did not affect 
teenagers' rate of experimentation with drugs, but may also have actually 
lowered their self-esteem. The study, called "Project DARE: No Effects at 
10-Year Follow-Up," bluntly deconstructs every claim the program makes. 
More than 1,000 10 year-olds enrolled in DARE classes were given a survey 
about drug use and self-esteem, and then, a decade later, the same group 
filled out the same questionnaire.

The findings were grim: 20-year-olds who'd had DARE classes were no less 
likely to have smoked marijuana or cigarettes, drunk alcohol, used 
"illicit" drugs like cocaine or heroin, or caved in to peer pressure than 
kids who'd never been exposed to DARE. But that wasn't all. "Surprisingly," 
the article states, "DARE status in the sixth grade was negatively related 
to self-esteem at age 20, indicating that individuals who were exposed to 
DARE in the sixth grade had lower levels of self-esteem 10 years later." 
Another study, performed at the University of Illinois, suggests some high 
school seniors who'd been in DARE classes were more likely to use drugs 
than their non-DARE peers.

The weakness in the old DARE program, as several studies suggest, was the 
simplicity of its message — and its panic-level assertions that "drug abuse 
is everywhere." Kids, program directors learned, don't respond well to 
hyperbole, and both the "Just Say No" message and the hysteria implied in 
the anti-drug rhetoric were pushing students away. It's also possible, some 
researchers speculate, that by making drugs seem more prevalent, or 
"normal" than they actually are, the DARE program might actually push kids 
who are anxious to fit in towards drugs.

Trying something new The new DARE curriculum, designed with these 
criticisms in mind, is less preachy, more experiential. It applies to a 
broader age-range than the old program, reaching kids not only in fifth 
grade but in seventh and ninth grades as well. It hinges on discussion 
groups rather than lectures. And it pointedly does not say "drug abuse is 
everywhere" - a new angle that researchers hope will make kids realize that 
maybe everyone doesn't use drugs after all - so maybe they don't need to 
either.

Programs like this inhale money, and by introducing a new curriculum, DARE 
officials guarantee a renewed federal grant, whether the program works or 
not. Obviously, the officials are hoping for the best. But even if the 
program fails, we can hope for a silver lining: Perhaps this first failure 
has taught DARE directors a degree of humility; maybe this time around it 
won't take them 10 years to recognize failure and plot a new course.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D