Pubdate: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 Source: Providence Journal, The (RI) Copyright: 2001 The Providence Journal Company Contact: 75 Fountain St., Providence RI 02902 Website: http://www.projo.com/ Author: Tom Mooney Bookmark: Reports about Colombia http://www.mapinc.org/area/colombia REED, CHAFEE SAY U.S. AID HELPING COLOMBIA'S WAR ON DRUGS Both Rhode Island senators, who just returned from the South American nation, are upbeat that the $1.3-billion aid package is making a difference in cutting cocaine production. Rhode Island's two U.S. senators say they're confident a $1.3-billion aid package to Colombia is fighting the drug trade as intended and might help to resolve the decades-old civil war between the government and guerrilla groups. Both Democrat Sen. Jack Reed and Republican Sen. Lincoln Chafee returned recently from separate trips to the South American country, where intensifying violence has spawned a new exodus of refugees to places such as Rhode Island, with large Colombian populations. The drug trade and Colombia's civil war are intricately woven. In the years since the fall of the Soviet Union, the country's two major Marxist guerrilla groups have turned to drug trafficking as their principle means of financing their war. Last year Congress approved sending $1.3 billion in mostly military aid to Colombia to help cut cocaine production (most of which is used in the United States) and, in turn, dry up the guerrillas' primary source of money. Both Reed and Chafee voted in favor of "Plan Colombia," which is supplying dozens of U.S. helicopters and 800 military and civilian advisers. About 300 Special Forces soldiers train the Colombian military in destroying cocaine-producing labs in the jungle, while the helicopters fly protection for Colombian planes fumigating coca fields. Colombia produces about 80 percent of the world's cocaine. Reed, who serves on the Senate Armed Services Committee, returned Sunday from two days in Colombia. There, he and several other senators met with Colombian President Andres Pastrana and visited training encampments. The Colombian soldiers "are serious about dealing with the issue of depressing coca production," Reed said, "and are highly motivated." In recent years, Colombia's military has also been harshly criticized for human-rights violations on its own countrymen. The allegations include working in collusion with private armies -- known as paramilitary groups -- which hunt down guerrillas and their sympathizers and have been responsible for brutal killings. "Through the training of American Special Forces," Reed said, "the military's sensitivity to human rights has increased. They are not perfect, but they understand they have to follow the law. "What we've done is try to assure that no American aid goes to any Colombian military unit with human-rights violations," Reed said. And all Colombian soldiers participating in Plan Colombia must have similar clean records, he said. Senator Chafee returned last week from three days in Colombia. A member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and chairman of the Western Hemisphere Subcommittee, Chafee supported passage of Plan Colombia "with reservations as to how it was going to be spent." Chafee was concerned the aid money would "end up in some Swiss bank account" rather than for its intended purpose. His recent trip reassured him. "It was surprising the commitment we were making down there and the enthusiasm for the challenge. I went with some skepticism that we would get the spin -- would be taken only to where the good things were happening. But in talking to as many people as possible on the periphery, I just got good feelings that because of the commitment we are making, [the guerrillas] are starting to negotiate. "I'm never one to relish getting involved in someone else's violent dispute," Chafee said, "but I think the good people of Colombia are looking for someone to help them." Some critics of Plan Colombia say further U.S. involvement within Colombia raises the potential of "another Vietnam." But neither Chafee nor Reed see that as a real danger. "I think the big difference here is the people of Colombia want the conflict ended," Chafee said. "They see other countries around them where democracy has taken root, economies are flourishing, and they want a piece of that and this is certainly an impediment to investment -- this anarchy that presently exists with kidnappings and bombings." Colombia has become the world's kidnap capital -- more than 3,100 reported last year -- as the guerrilla groups turn to kidnapping for ransom members of the nation's middle- and upper-classes. While a Vietnam scenario is one to be mindful of, Reed said, several differences exist that prevent it from happening. "First, the Colombian military force is a credible military force that is willing to conduct these operations themselves. Secondly, this is a country that has a history over several hundred years of democracy. They freely elect their president and leaders. They also have high rates of literacy and this is not a nation that doesn't have the institutions you need to operate independently." Colombian President Pastrana, in a meeting with U.S. governors Tuesday in Washington, promised that the United States would "never get bogged down" in Colombia's conflict. Pastrana said neither the people in Colombia or the United States would support U.S. troop involvement. "In short," he said, "it is not on the table, not now or in the future." - --- MAP posted-by: Kirk Bauer