Pubdate: Sun, 08 Apr 2001
Source: Province, The (CN BC)
Copyright: 2001 The Province
Contact:  http://www.vancouverprovince.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/476
Author: Jason Proctor

WHERE'S THE COMPASSION?

Sad to say, but a lot of people on Jackie's block have cancer. The 
63-year-old Surrey woman hates the thought of so many friends suffering, 
but she can't help them all. So she only gave marijuana to her next-door 
neighbour.

A straight-as-an-arrow Christian, Jackie discovered pot after a mastectomy. 
She smokes a joint about twice a week, to kill chronic pain.

Like thousands of British Columbians, she was glad to see Ottawa introduce 
regulations Friday governing legal use of medicinal marijuana. But 
regulations are regulations. And for a woman living in agony, the thought 
of jumping through any hoops for simple comfort is unbearable.

"It's a beginning, but it's nothing really. And to get it through the 
government -- people like me aren't going to do that. We'll just go on 
doing what we're doing," says Jackie, who asked that her last name not be 
published. "I would like to see the government just leave it alone. 
Legalize it, and then we could grow it in our backyards and there wouldn't 
be any of this crime."

Medicinal marijuana advocates saw a blessing and a curse in the 
regulations. The rules would create three categories of patients.

First priority -- with easiest access to marijuana -- would be patients 
expected to die within a year. The next group would be chronic-illness 
sufferers required to present a statement from a medical specialist saying 
conventional treatments had been tried and found inappropriate for severe 
pain, nausea, anorexia, seizures, spasms or weakness from specified 
diseases including cancer, AIDS, multiple sclerosis and arthritis.

Patients with medical conditions that fit in neither of the first two 
categories would comprise the third group and would have to obtain 
statements from two medical specialists.

Legalization of marijuana as medicine has long been the cause of the 
so-called compassion clubs which have sprung up across Canada in recent 
years to provide seriously ill people with pot and information surrounding 
its use as a treatment.

But those same organizations were snubbed in the proposed regulations, 
which would not allow compassion clubs to supply medical marijuana. The 
rules would allow patients to grow medical pot for personal use or to 
designate a grower. Designated growers would be allowed a maximum of three 
patients each.

That news angered John Conroy, the lawyer for the B.C. Compassion Club, 
which has 1,400 members. Conroy was instrumental in winning an absolute 
discharge in B.C. Supreme Court last summer for Bill Small, a former 
director of the club who pleaded guilty to cultivating the drug.

As part of his decision, Justice Randall Wong recognized the legitimacy of 
marijuana as a medical cure.

"It disappoints me to hear that they're cutting out the compassion clubs," 
said Conroy. "They're the people who've been dealing with the 
patients.  They're the people who've been trying to get the stuff tested so 
they control the quality of the product. It strikes me as a bit odd that 
they would exclude those with expertise."

The regulations come at a time when Lower Mainland police appear to be 
stepping up their relentless campaigns to bust grow operations. The rules 
would provide strict requirements for people hoping to use or grow 
marijuana. And RCMP spokesman Cpl. Grant Learned said the war on drugs 
remains business as usual for law enforcement.

"Marijuana is one of the commodities that is used in national and 
international markets as a trading chip for other drugs and weapons," said 
Learned. "And it is one of the commodities used by organized crime."

The rules make Canada the only country in the world with a 
government-regulated system for using marijuana as medicine. Strangely, the 
strongest endorsement of the cause came from the Minnesota governor -- the 
always colourful Jesse Ventura.

"Who is government to tell someone, if they have AIDS or cancer, what they 
should be taking?" said Ventura in response to a student's question.

"What's the difference between that and giving morphine, from a doctor, or 
Percodan, or the favourite today -- what's the one they put half the women 
on? Prozac. Now what's that all about?"
- ---
MAP posted-by: Beth