Pubdate: Sat, 07 Apr 2001 Source: Danbury News-Times Copyright: Danbury News-Times 2001 Website: www.newstimes.com Contact: Brian Saxton WESTCONN HEARS LEGAL POT DEBATE DANBURY Robert Stutman can understand why some people might see them as The Odd Couple. The 57-year-old retired special agent for the federal Drug Enforcement Administration teamed up with Steve Hager, 49-year-old editor-in-chief of High Times magazine on the lecture circuit two months ago to publicly debate the pros and cons of legalizing marijuana. Stutman thinks it would be a "serious mistake.'' Hager believes it would stop the drug war and end the nation's violence. But, as students at Western Connecticut State University saw Thursday night in a debate dubbed "The Heads Versus the Feds,'' they seem to differ amicably. "We do it without being disagreeable or disrespectful,'' said Stutman, who now lives in Florida. "We completely disagree about the issue but I think we've grown to like each other.'' On Thursday, it was the WestConn chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) that brought them together by sponsoring their 12th debate since they became a team. NORML is a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit lobbying organization formed in 1970 to end the prohibition of marijuana and stop the arrests of smokers. "Millions of Americans use marijuana,'' says NORML. "Few abuse it. Arresting these otherwise law-abiding citizens serves no legitimate purpose.'' High Times magazine, which Hager says celebrates what he calls "the counter-culture'' and advertises itself on the Internet as the "premier journal'' of marijuana-related news, supports NORML's work. Hager argued Thursday that the legalization of marijuana for adults and its regulated use would keep it out of the hands of children, would end corruption in America and become a powerful medicine to help many illnesses. "It would be a grave and tragic mistake to prosecute sick people for using it,'' he told students. Stutman agreed with Hager that no one should go to jail for using marijuana and conceded there "may'' be some possible medicinal use for it, but he warned that legalization could increase accidents on the highway and in the workplace. "I think it also would interfere with people's rationale, especially young people,'' he said. "It's more harmful than most people believe and just as dangerous as tobacco.'' Stutman concedes the government's present war on drugs is "far from perfect'' and needs many changes. "We should spend less money on closing borders because that doesn't work,'' he said. "Far more money should be spent on education and treatment.'' One member of the audience, Aubri Fox, a 20-year-old sophomore, said she went because she thought it was a good idea to have the debate. "I'm pro-legalizing marijuana,'' she said, "so I think this is a good way of seeing the political aspect of the issue and not just the stoner (drugged up) aspect.'' - --- MAP posted-by: Josh Sutcliffe