Pubdate: Mon, 16 Apr 2001
Source: Houston Chronicle (TX)
Copyright: 2001 Houston Chronicle
Contact:  http://www.chron.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/198
Author: Morgan Reynolds
Note: Reynolds is a professor of economics at Texas A&M University and a 
senior fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas.

RACIAL PROFILING IS LESS ABOUT RACE THAN MOST THINK

DWB -- driving while black -- is the latest manifestation of our 
intractable racial divide. Cops allegedly stop black motorists more than 
whites, looking for illegal drugs and other mischief. The easy explanation? 
Bigoted cops just like to do this stuff.

It's not that simple, of course. Directing the attorney general to study 
the problem and come up with solutions, President Bush has put profiling 
high on his agenda, saying that "it's wrong and we will not do it in 
America. We will not hinder the work of our nation's brave police officers. 
But by stopping the abuses of a few, we will add to the public confidence 
our police officers earn and deserve."

Now that's a balanced statement, playing to all sides. No trade-offs to 
worry about here. We'll repair the black perception that they are being 
singled out, yet maintain police morale and vigorous law enforcement. In 
cities like Los Angeles, however, active policing has fallen to zip because 
every officer is worried about whether his history of arrests is racially 
correct. Crime has taken a predictable jump up, largely at the expense of 
black victims.

While there's real content to the black perception of harassment and 
injustice, the handy explanation of racism is faulty. The root of the 
problem traces back to the government's disastrous war on drugs: Cops 
aren't out to get blacks so much as to get drug dealers, creating 
collateral damage for black motorists.

Allow me to explain. First, study after study supports the proposition that 
the criminal justice system, overall, is not systematically racist. With 
occasional exceptions, virtually everyone gets a fair shake in the U.S. 
justice system. So it's a myth that our modern legal system is rotten with 
discrimination. Greater numbers of black police officers and black judges, 
for example, have failed to reduce the racial disparities in our prisons 
and elsewhere in the justice system. Studies also find that if anything, a 
black felony defendant is more likely to be acquitted in a jury trial than 
his white counterpart.

Second, there is a real problem of disproportionate stops of black 
motorists. A new study by three economists at the University of 
Pennsylvania, John Knowles and two colleagues, demonstrates that cops stop 
black motorists at a higher rate than white motorists because it's the best 
way to get a lot of drug arrests and convictions, not because of racism. 
How do the authors know this?

They studied the 1990s data on highway stops by the Maryland State Police. 
Indeed, black motorists were stopped at a rate 3.5 times that for white 
motorists. Traffic studies and police testimony show that blacks and whites 
are not distinguishable by their driving behavior. Despite the relatively 
high search rate for black motorists, the police found contraband in the 
same percentage for both races, about one in three searches. So there is 
"statistical discrimination," we might say, rather than race prejudice at work.

It's a fact, unpleasant as it may be to admit, that blacks are 
disproportionately involved in the drug trade and good police work takes 
this into account. So at one level, it's fine-'n-dandy: The evidence clears 
the Maryland cops of racism. After exhaustive analysis, the authors even 
conclude that there is evidence for bias against white and Hispanic 
motorists rather than black.

But even if the study is representative and correct, all is not well 
because two of three stops are criminally unproductive for both races. More 
importantly, innocent black motorists are stopped 3.5 times more often than 
their white counterparts. That's the real problem and a justified beef by 
the black community.

There are lawsuits against state governments for harassment of innocent 
black motorists, including the state of Maryland. While the law is 
currently unsettled, it does not prohibit the use of race in police work, 
provided that there is a reasonable linkage between race and likely 
criminal involvement. Yet such "statistical discrimination," innocent of 
prejudice though it may be, is under attack. The American Civil Liberties 
Union, for one, demands an end to racial profiling in police work. The cost 
would be reduced police efficiency and higher crime.

The president and the rest of us want to improve "the just and equal 
administration of our nation's laws." The real place to start would be the 
war on drugs. We've been grinding away at the dope trade for decades and to 
what end? Futility and disaster. The disproportionate harassment of black 
motorists is just one of its evil consequences.

If government backed off, the DWB problem would diminish and race relations 
would improve, much to the surprise of many.

Reynolds is a professor of economics at Texas A&M University and a senior 
fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Jo-D