Pubdate: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 Source: Vancouver Courier (CN BC) Copyright: 2001 Vancouver Courier Contact: http://www.vancourier.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/474 Author: Geoff Olson DRUGS, WAR AND TRADE ARE JUST BUSINESS AS USUAL Jfk, Cia, Kgb, Fbi, Nsa, Ufo, Nasa. There may be no necessary relationship between some or any of them, but all have figured in various conspiracy theories over the years. In terms of looniness, some of these constructs have even matched the one-man play written for Lee Harvey Oswald by the Warren Commission. (The multiple gunmen theory of the JFK assassination recently received support from acoustic analysis of law enforcement audio tapes from Dealy Plaza. This goes to show that the nuttiest of conspiracy theories doesn't automatically disqualify all of them. ) I think it fair to now add WTO, GAT, NAFTA and the IMF into the alphabet soup of dark doings. This brings me to a conspiracy theory of my own, one that subsumes all the acronymns above. I call it BAU: Business As Usual. There's nothing new under the sun, I contend-just minor variations on the age-old theme of the elite accumulating power and protecting privilege, while trying to snooker everyone else into believing otherwise. Consider the equation made between corporate success and nationalistic pride: Americans are proud of Coca-Cola, Germans proud of Volkswagen, the French proud of Peugeot, etc. It doesn't run both ways; in fact, most transnational corporations have never had any particular allegiance to their points of origin. In 1996, at the annual stockholders' meeting of GM in Deleware, a lone stockholder noted the presence of the American flag on one side of the platform. Observing that GM had eliminated 73,000 U.S. jobs, while creating the exact same number in low-wage countries in the past decade, he asked CEO John Smith and the board of directors to join him in pledging allegiance to the flag. They refused. (Perhaps there'd have been a better chance if it was a pirate flag.) This kind of refusal is in keeping with the transnational spirit. In 1968, the telecommunications giant ITT received $26 million in compensation from the American government for damage done to ITT's German plants by Allied bombers. As Anthony Sampson put it in his study of the wartime activities of the company, "the only power (CEO) Sosthenes Behn consistently served was the sovereign power of ITT." Business As Usual. As for war in general, for most of the 20th century, from the Krupp's arming of European powers to the more recent British/American arming of opposing Middle Eastern interests-Iran and Iraq included-it's been BAU. BAU also enters into the alleged link between cocaine trafficking and CIA covert operations. Defenders of the spook network admit that maybe once or twice a plane registered to the agency flew into L.A. or Miami packed with Bolivian marching powder-but these were aberrations, they say. Besides, the pilots were of Colombian, Nicaraguan, or Honduran origin. Uh-huh. The fact is, as a matter of course, the CIA signs on foreign nationals as paid operatives, since having blue-eyed boys from Yale or Harvard sitting around cantinas quaffing Cerveza doesn't provide for the best cover. In fact, the intelligence agency drug connection goes back at least to World War II. In the meticulously researched and sobering Whiteout: The CIA, Drugs and the Press, Andrew Cockburn recounts how Mussolini's war on the Sicilian mafia made the latter a useful ally of the United States against the fascist leader. To demonstrate American goodwill, the Office of Naval Intelligence arranged the release of mobster Lucky Luciano, America's most notorious gangster after Al Capone. According to Cockburn, not only did this cement a long association between American intelligence services and the mafia, it also had enormous consequences for the global heroin trade. Yet even by World War II, official complicity in drug trafficking was already BAU. The 19th century "opium war" was initiated by Chinese attempts to block the British imports of opium from India, on the grounds it was harming people's health. Disturbed by government interference with trade, the British replied with warships, forcing the Chinese to cede Hong Kong and winning the day for drug addiction. Given the arc of history, I think it safe to conclude that FTAA, GAT, WTO, and NAFTA are new moonshine for an old kegger. The label reads BAU-and the drinks are on us. - --- MAP posted-by: Jo-D