Pubdate: Sun, 13 May 2001 Source: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (MA) Copyright: 2001 Worcester Telegram & Gazette Contact: http://www.telegram.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/509 Author: Robert Z. Nemeth Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?137 (Needle Exchange) NEEDLE EXCHANGE STEMS SPREAD OF DEADLY DISEASE Dr. Howard Koh, commissioner of the state Department of Public Health, is one of many top health care professionals persuaded by scientific data that needle exchange programs for intravenous drug users prevent the spread of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. "I have come from not-so-sure to being absolutely certain," he told me during a recent interview. "This epidemic is preventable," he said. "Yet we have not made progress in years because the debate has been emotional rather than data-based. We have between 700 and 800 new cases each year in the state, traceable to intravenous drug use. That is a failure of the system." "We haven't seen anything yet about what the effect (of dirty needles) on hepatitis C may be," Jean McGuire, assistant commissioner and director of the department's HIV-AIDS bureau, added. "With about 110,000 people already infected in the state, that disease is spreading." "Whether needle exchange is effective is no longer an issue. That question has long been answered," said Joseph D. McKee, director of client services at AIDS Project Worcester Inc. A native of Northern Ireland and a practicing Roman Catholic, he moved to this country with his family after hatemongers burned down his father's business. "I know what bigotry and prejudice can do," he said. Indeed, the evidence in favor of needle exchange is overwhelming. Among the organizations supporting the program are the National Academy of Science, American Medical Association, American Public Health Association, American Bar Association, American Pharmaceutical Association and the U.S. Conference of Mayors. The list of leading experts backing the clean-syringe program is a virtual "Who's Who" of medicine and science. The U.S. Surgeon General and the Department of Health and Human Services declared there is conclusive evidence that needle exchange reduces the spread of HIV while it does not increase illicit drug use or crime. Claims that the so-called "Vancouver and Montreal studies" detected an increase in HIV transmission among participants in needle exchange programs have been soundly rebuffed by the studies' original authors and by subsequent data. Having watched the devastating effect of intravenous drug abuse in Worcester, Mr. McKee spearheaded an effort in 1995 to persuade the City Council to authorize needle exchange. When the advocates were turned down, Mr. McKee joined the Harm and Risk Reduction Coalition that developed a new, clinic-based rehabilitation program. The council rejected that model in 1998. Mr. McKee then decided to work with the Massachusetts AIDS Policy Task Force. "We tried to accomplish our goal at the state level rather than fighting the issue town-by-town," he said. The task force backed a bill by state Sen. James P. Jajuga, D-Methuen, that would allow the DPH to actively prevent the transmission of HIV/AIDS and hepatitis C. The Legislature's Joint Health Committee approved the measure, but former Gov. Paul Cellucci vetoed a budget provision for the program because he was concerned about the lack of local consensus. However, the bill provides for a local advisory committee "to solicit community input" and report to the commissioner before a final decision is made on implementation of needle exchange programs. The Jajuga bill, now co-sponsored by state Sens. Harriette L. Chandler and Richard T. Moore, has been resubmitted and will be considered at a legislative hearing on June 11. Meanwhile the DPH has launched a statewide education program, complete with radio ads and billboards, to inform the public. "The balance between local control and state involvement is delicate," Dr. Koh noted. "I always prefer the route where people are educated." "This program is not just walking in and getting clean needles. Syringe exchange is part of a comprehensive HIV prevention strategy," Mr. McKee explained. "It entails substance abuse counseling and treatment at community health centers already involved in the fight against drug and alcohol addiction." Services include medical screening and psychiatric evaluation, detoxification, HIV testing and counseling, testing for sexually transmitted infection, medical care and long-term follow-up. "Addicts can and do recover. And preventing AIDS or hepatitis is far less expensive than the treatment," Mr. McKee stressed. Said Dr. Koh, a physician, "People with addictions should not be viewed as criminals. Addiction is a disease, and all humans are susceptible to it. The enemy is not human beings. It's contaminated needles." Unprotected sex among gays is not the leading cause of new HIV and AIDS cases in Massachusetts; injection drug use is. The DPH has the power to actively prevent the transmission of every communicable disease, except the deadliest one: HIV and AIDS. It does not have the authority to organize clean needle exchange programs. A poll by the McCormack Institute of the University of Massachusetts last year showed that 64 percent of registered voters in the state favor needle exchange. The Society of Christian Ethics declared, "Needle exchange programs are ethical and should be fostered."In Boston, Cambridge, Northampton and Provincetown needle exchange has reduced the transmission of the HIV virus that causes AIDS and hepatitis C without encouraging illegal drug use. But in cities that have no needle exchanges, the epidemic has spread. In Lowell, 60 percent of new AIDS cases are attributed to intravenous drug use; in New Bedford, 58 percent, and in Worcester, 53 percent. The situation is particularly troubling in Worcester. More than 52 percent of substance abuse in Central Massachusetts is heroin-related, with 49 percent traced to the use of syringes. This is nearly double the rate in most communities. While nationwide 27 percent of women diagnosed with HIV/AIDS are injection drug users, the percentage in Massachusetts is 40 percent -- and in Worcester 49 percent. "I find it unconscionable that we allow people to get infected with a disease for which there is no cure when the epidemic could be curtailed," Ms. McGuire said. "If we adopted needle exchange in Worcester, we could curtail the spread of the disease by one-third within 18 months," Mr. McKee pledged. I, too, have traveled the road from skeptic to believer with Dr. Koh and others. I'm persuaded there is nothing to lose and much to gain from a well-organized needle exchange program in Worcester. - --- MAP posted-by: Josh Sutcliffe