Pubdate: Tue, 22 May 2001 Source: Bergen Record (NJ) Copyright: 2001 Bergen Record Corp. Contact: http://www.bergen.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/44 Author: David G. Evans Note: David G. Evans, counsel for the Legal Foundation Against Illegal Drugs, submitted a brief on behalf of 50 individuals and drug prevention organizations in the Supreme Court case. He grew up in Bergen County and practices in Pittstown, N.J. HIGH COURT WAS RIGHT TO NIX MEDICINAL POT OVER THE LAST THREE decades, the advocates of drug-legalization have employed a number of political and legal strategies to legitimize smoking marijuana. Recently they used a California ballot initiative to approve smoked marijuana as medicine. They put out misleading and inaccurate information that smoking marijuana can help ill people. Californians, out of compassion for sick people, bought it. The efforts to legitimize smoking marijuana through ballot initiatives seriously threaten the Food and Drug Administration's process of approving safe medicines. It creates an atmosphere of medicine by popular vote, rather than the rigorous scientific and medical process that all medicines must currently undergo. The U.S. Supreme Court in the case of U.S. vs. Oakland Cannabis Buyers Cooperative recently reviewed the California initiative and unanimously decided that smoked marijuana has "no currently accepted medical use at all." In deciding that smoked crude marijuana is not a medicine, the court upheld the FDA drug approval process that has protected Americans from unsafe and ineffective drugs for nearly a century. As a cancer survivor, I am appalled by how seriously ill people have been victimized by the cruel hoax of smoked marijuana as medicine. It is not compassionate to give marijuana cigarettes to sick people. They may mistakenly choose to smoke marijuana instead of using medicines that are truly effective. Crude smoked marijuana contains some 400 chemicals. Smoked marijuana, an impure and toxic substance, has no place in our medicine cabinets. Before the development of modern pharmaceutical science, the field of medicine was fraught with potions. There were many anecdotal stories about these potions as there are today about smoked marijuana. Many people were convinced that these potions helped them. However, many of these potions were absolutely useless, or conversely were harmful to unsuspecting ill people. Thus evolved our current FDA drug approval processes, which should not be undermined. Smoked marijuana as medicine has been rejected by the American Medical Association, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, the American Glaucoma Society, the American Academy of Opthalmology, and the American Cancer Society. Recently, the federal Institute of Medicine also conducted research on this issue and they see "little future in smoked marijuana as a medicine." There are good reasons why they reject smoked marijuana. The major reason to reject crude smoked marijuana is that numerous safe and effective FDA-approved medicines are available for all the conditions that smoked marijuana supposedly helps. This includes a drug in liquid form that is derived from the marijuana plant and was approved by the FDA for treating nausea in cancer patients and wasting in AIDS patients. The drug's generic name is dronabinol, the trade name is Marinol. The respiratory damage associated with marijuana smoke speaks against inhaling marijuana as a medicine. Smoked marijuana is associated with higher concentrations of tar, carbon monoxide, and carcinogens than even cigarette smoke. One of the earliest findings in marijuana research was the effect on the various bodily immune functions. Cellular immunity is impaired, pulmonary immunity is impaired, and the impaired ability to fight infection is now documented in humans. It is clear that use of smoked marijuana bears substantial health risks especially for people at high risk for infection and immune suppression such as AIDS and cancer chemotherapy patients. The government of the Netherlands did an extensive study to assess the efficacy of marijuana for medical use. The Dutch government studied the scientific literature published during the past 25 years and concluded that the evidence is insufficient to justify the medical use of marijuana. Scientific literature shows that use of marijuana is a major risk factor in the development of addiction and drug use among our school children. The efforts to confuse the public about marijuana have contributed to the drop in school children's perception of marijuana's harm, and this has resulted in an increase in marijuana and other drug use among schoolchildren. Of the nearly 182,000 kids in treatment today, 48 percent were admitted for abuse or addiction to marijuana while only 19.3 percent for alcohol and 2.9 percent for cocaine, 2.4 percent for methamphetamine, and 2.3 percent for heroin. It is no coincidence that those states with medical marijuana initiatives have among the highest levels of drug use and drug addiction. Smoking marijuana as medicine is a fraud. I am glad the Supreme Court saw through it. This is a victory for our children and for people suffering with illnesses who have been mislead by false claims. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom