Pubdate: Thu, 17 May 2001 Source: Daily Aztec, The (US CA Edu) Copyright: 2001 The Daily Aztec Contact: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1420 Website: http://www.dailyaztec.com/ Author: Reed Albergotti Note: Reed Albergotti is a journalism junior and assistant opinion editor for The Daily Aztec. Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/ocbc.htm (Oakland Cannabis Court Case) AMERICA'S LAST DANCE WITH MARY JANE? The Supreme Court ruled Monday against the Oakland Cannabis Buyer's Cooperative, setting a national precedent against the medicinal distribution of marijuana. In its unanimous decision, the high court went against the American grain. Public opinion has shifted dramatically to the left of the "just say no" era because of the growing volume of anti-war-on-drugs rhetoric. The medical community has embraced the use of the drug since 1996, when California became the first state to legalize the medicinal use of marijuana. But Clarence Thomas, when defending the court's opinion, said the drug had "no accepted medical use at all." It would be interesting to see Thomas attempt to explain that opinion to a dying cancer patient or someone suffering from AIDS. Marijuana has been the only relief for many suffering from these afflictions. Now, it will be much more difficult to alleviate the pain. The Supreme Court ruled on very narrow grounds -- the Oakland Cannabis Buyer's Cooperative had to prove that marijuana had a definite medical benefit. This is a difficult feat because the government will not dole out enough of the drug for significant tests to be conducted. Could this action be politically motivated? The government doesn't want tests done on marijuana because the results could lead to a wider acceptance -- possibly even a shift of public opinion against the prohibition of the drug. If marijuana is legalized, a large chunk of a multi-billion dollar government industry is erased and thousands of DEA and FBI agents are out of work. The prohibition of the medicinal use of marijuana has as much to do with the loss of government jobs as it does with the treatment of dying patients. Barry McCaffrey, the 'Drug Czar' of the Clinton Administration, commented on the ruling: He likened smoking marijuana to drinking a couple of glasses of vodka. Why is it that the people in charge of America's drug policy know nothing about the drugs they preside over? If vodka and marijuana provided equal relief for cancer patients, it is doubtful they would go through the trouble of obtaining marijuana. It is doubtful that so many doctors would endorse the medicinal use of marijuana. If America is a representative democracy, why are Congress and the Supreme Court so unrepresentative of the will of the people? What will it take for people inflicted with cancer and AIDS to have a voice in this country? Does Congress have to oust a couple of relics that still believe in the war on drugs and replace their seats with those in need of medicinal marijuana? Until that happens, it looks like cancer patients will be growing their own - -- hopefully the DEA doesn't bust down their doors and push their wheelchairs directly into federal work camps. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake