Pubdate: Sun, 03 Jun 2001
Source: Denver Post (CO)
Copyright: 2001 The Denver Post Corp
Contact:  http://www.denverpost.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/122
Author: Karen Auge, Denver Post Medical Writer

FEDS: POT LAW IS STATE'S PROBLEM

Warning To Medical Users Is 'Speculation'

If Gov. Bill Owens and Attorney General Ken Salazar have a problem with the 
state's new medical marijuana law, they shouldn't look to federal 
prosecutors for the solution, Colorado's U.S. attorney said.

"Neither the governor nor the attorney general should engage in unfounded 
speculation about who might be prosecuted in federal court," Richard 
Spriggs, acting U.S. attorney for Colorado, said in a prepared statement 
issued late Friday.

Spriggs' remarks were a blunt response to an earlier statement from 
Salazar, in which the attorney general said a recent U.S. Supreme Court 
decision doesn't invalidate Colorado's marijuana law.

Salazar also said he had called on Spriggs to "enforce federal law," and 
stated that he had warned doctors they could face federal prosecution if 
they participate in the medical marijuana program.

"We in the U.S. Attorney's Office are truly grateful to Governor Owens and 
Attorney General Salazar for sharing their problem with us," Spriggs said. 
"We, however, are not the solution to their problem. That solution (if 
there is one) lies with the 22 duly elected district attorneys and local 
police."

The exchange - via faxed statements - was triggered by the U.S. Supreme 
Court. Last month, the high court ruled that there is no exception in 
federal anti-drug laws for medical use of marijuana. In that California 
case, the court upheld federal prosecutors' right to close down cannabis 
buyers' clubs despite a state law allowing medical marijuana use.

The ruling sparked speculation that Colorado's Amendment 20, approved by 
voters last November and opposed by both Owens and Salazar, might not hold 
up to judicial scrutiny.

The amendment lets people petition the state to be included on a registry 
of patients allowed to possess up to two ounces of marijuana, or a few 
marijuana plants. To be included on that registry, applicants must have one 
of a handful of specified illnesses, and must have a doctor verify their 
condition and sign a statement saying that they might benefit from smoking 
marijuana.

Last month, Salazar's office reviewed Amendment 20, and the Supreme Court 
ruling, and concluded that Colorado's constitutional amendment should stand.

At the same time, Salazar sent a letter to the Colorado Medical Society, 
warning that doctors who recommend marijuana for patients could face 
federal prosecution.

But Friday, Alan Gilbert, Colorado solicitor general, confirmed that while 
the attorney general's office might encourage federal prosecutors to go 
after doctors, they couldn't do much to aid such prosecutions.

Amendment 20 calls for the medical marijuana registry to be confidential - 
including the names of doctors who sign the applications, Gilbert said.

And the attorney general's office likely would fight any attempt to 
subpoena that information, he said.

"We will defend as vigorously as we can the confidentiality of the 
registry," Gilbert said.

"I don't think that's a conflict," he said. "In order to enforce against 
doctors, the prosecuting authority would have to find out somehow (doctors' 
names). They just can't find out this way."

Federal law prohibits possession and sale of marijuana, and labels it a 
class-one narcotic - putting it in the same category as heroin and LSD.

Colorado, like most states, has its own set of drug laws.

There are many cases where states and the federal government have 
complementary sets of laws, said Dick Weatherbee, law enforcement 
coordinator for the U.S. attorney's office in Colorado.

Theoretically, someone who possesses or is selling illegal drugs is 
eligible to be prosecuted by state or federal authorities, Weatherbee said.

Who prosecutes the case often depends on which agency uncovers the drug 
activity - if a local police department makes the arrest, a local 
prosecutor usually handles the case. If a federal agency, like the Drug 
Enforcement Agency, handles the investigation, it is usually turned over to 
federal prosecutors.

Cases involving very large amounts of drugs, or where a suspected wide 
distribution network is uncovered, often fall under federal jurisdiction.

Despite all the questions it has raised, Amendment 20 took effect Friday as 
scheduled.

The state health department, which is overseeing the program, mailed out 
about 75 information and application packets in the weeks leading up to the 
law's implementation.

Before the year is out, the department expects to handle about 800.
- ---
MAP posted-by: Beth