Published http://www.mapinc.org/resource/tips.htm Pubdate: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 Source: Recorder, The (CA) Copyright: 1999 NLP IP Company Contact: http://www.callaw.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/652 Author: Robert Sharpe, http://www.mapinc.org/writers/Robert+Sharpe Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v01/n945/a03.html Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/prop36.htm (Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act) OMISSIONS AND ERRORS DISTORT COMMENTARY A Call For A Truce In The War On Drugs The implementation of Proposition 36 may be difficult, but the shift toward public health approaches to drug use is long overdue ("Learning to Live With Prop 36," May 25). With violent crime rates continuing along a downward trend, the drug war is the primary reason the United States now has the highest incarceration rate in the world. At an average cost of $25,071 per inmate annually, maintaining the world's largest prison system can hardly be considered fiscally conservative. Putting Americans with substance abuse problems behind bars with hardened criminals is a dangerous proposition. Prisons transmit violent habits and values rather than reduce them. Harsh drug laws do not distinguish between occasional drug use and chronic abuse. Politically popular mandatory minimums have turned many a taxpaying recreational drug user into a long-term tax burden. In order for drug treatment to be truly effective policymakers are going to have to tone down the tough-on-drugs rhetoric. Would alcoholics seek treatment if doing so were tantamount to confessing to criminal activity? Likewise, would putting every incorrigible alcoholic behind bars and saddling them with criminal records prove cost-effective? It's time to declare peace in the failed drug war. The growing number of Americans who favor public health approaches to substance abuse are looking to California to lead the way. Robert Sharpe, M.P.A. Program Officer The Lindesmith Center-Drug Policy Foundation, Washington, D.C. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake