Pubdate: Mon, 29 Apr 2002
Source: Report Magazine (CN AB)
Copyright: 2002 Report Magazine, United Western Comm Ltd
Contact:  http://www.report.ca/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1327
Note: This is the BC Edition
Author: Eli Byfield
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/pot.htm (Cannabis)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada)

POT MAKES YOU, LIKE, SMARTER

A Long-term Study Of Its Effects Reaches Surprising Conclusions

ANYONE who has tried conversing with a pot-smoker knows why they call it 
"dope," but the drug's longer-term effects on intelligence may be 
negligible. According to a study published in the Canadian Medical 
Association Journal April 2, even heavy marijuana users do not risk 
permanently reducing their intelligence. Indeed, light users may actually 
grow smarter.

In the late 1970s, the Ottawa Prenatal Prospective Study (OPPS), launched 
by psychologists at Ottawa's Carleton University, recruited dozens of 
pregnant, middle-class, Ontario women, some of them pot- and 
cigarette-smokers. Researchers have followed their children from birth, 
monitoring their marijuana intake and testing their intelligence every few 
years.

The study relied on a combination of urinalyses and self-reporting to gauge 
consumption. Intelligence levels were determined through IQ tests. Four of 
the original 74 were eliminated: two for discrepancies between 
self-reporting and urinalysis samples, two for ingesting other drugs.

The Carleton team administered drug and IQ tests on each subject between 
the ages of 9 and 12 (before being exposed to marijuana) and between 17 and 
20 to determine changes in intelligence. They categorized their subjects as 
non-users, former regular users, current light users and current heavy users.

The universal average for IQ is 100. The entire group averaged 113.8 on 
their tests as preteens, rising, on average, 2.6 points to 116.4 as young 
adults. Carleton psychology professor and study director Peter Fried says 
that the marginal rise was to be expected among normal middle-class teens.

However, the IQ of current heavy marijuana users (five or more joints per 
week) actually dropped from an average 109 as children to about 105 eight 
years later. "This seems to be only a four-point drop," explains the 
professor. He counts it as six points, however, because their level should 
have risen two points.

"Current light" pot-smokers (less than five joints per week), surprisingly, 
underwent a six-point boost on their tests over the years, going from 112 
to 118. Prof. Fried stops short of recommending cannabis to students, 
however. Considering the small sample of light users (only nine) and the 
2.6-point increase in non-users, he regards the six-point rise as 
statistically insignificant.

The most interesting of the study's findings was the IQ rise in former 
users (who had not smoked pot in at least three months). Of nine "formers," 
five had smoked pot heavily (37 joints per week), but their scores went up 
roughly four points after they quit. This indicates, thinks Prof. Fried, 
that "marijuana has no long-term effect on global intelligence." He hastens 
to add that these statistics were tabulated on teenagers over an eight-year 
period. They may not apply to longer-term chronic smokers.

Also convincing, though, is the fact that former heavy users, averaging 37 
joints per week, had smoked considerably more pot than current heavy users, 
14 joints per week. "People who smoked five joints per day recovered their 
IQs within three months," the professor observes.

The study is ongoing. Prof. Fried plans to analyze the IQ tests and break 
them down to reveal the drug's effects on memory and attention. According 
to him, "There are 12 parts to intelligence. By focusing on certain 
questions within the IQ tests, we should be able to determine marijuana's 
influence on each part individually."