Pubdate: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 Source: Technician, The (NC State University) Copyright: 2002 The Technician Contact: http://technicianonline.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2268 Note: also listed as a contact Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/youth.htm (Youth) POT PATROL INVADES WAKE SCHOOLS Wake County Middle and High Schools Will Use a New Litmus Paper Test for Illegal Drug Use. A Washington, D.C., company has provided litmus-paper, drug-screen tests, free of charge, to Wake County middle and high schools as part of a federally funded pilot program. The test will be administered to students who are suspected of using marijuana due to suspicious circumstances such as a strong odor, according to Corey Duber, Wake senior director for security. This plan draws criticism from groups, such as the American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina, because of the questionable accuracy of the testing devices and the fact that the original purpose of the program was to test the environment, not students. School officials should be concerned about illegal drug use on campus, but when teachers begin taking students out of the classroom setting to rub paper on their belongings, the learning process is interrupted. The original concept of this program was to provide a means for schools to test their environment for illegal drug use. The tool to do so is a strip of litmus paper that can be rubbed on surfaces like hands or book bags. A spray is applied to the residue, which causes the paper to change color within seconds if traces of drug residue are detected. This test can be an important resource for schools that want to test surfaces of the school environment. If rest rooms, locker rooms or other areas of campus test positive for illegal drug residue, then officials will know that they have problems that need to be addressed. These tests on students will only test for marijuana, while tests on surfaces will also screen for cocaine, heroin and methamphetamines. >From that discovery, administrators can move ahead to solve the problem on a more direct level focused on drug activity on school grounds. The extension of the program to testing individual students is not appropriate, however, because there can be too many mistakes made with this inexact test. Although rules are not in place about how to use the kits, Duber has stated that school personnel, not police, will administer the test, starting as soon as October. This means those students who test positive for drug residue cannot be criminally prosecuted, but they can be suspended, according to Duber. The problem with testing for mere drug residue is that the residue can appear if a student has had any type of contact with something touching drugs. For example, if students are crowded in a narrow hallway, drug residue from one student could brush against another student, possibly contaminating their clothes or book bag and making that student test positive. In addition, a student may come into contact with residue from sources outside of the school, even in the home environment, when that child was in fact never using an illegal substance personally. Since students and their families know that these tests have possible flaws, they will contest every positive result. In addition, how would school personnel decide who to test? The ACLU is concerned that, while police officials would need probable cause, teachers and other staff members would not need as high of standards to choose who to test. One role of a school is to ensure a safe learning environment for students, including making the grounds free from illegal activities. This would make testing actual school property appropriate as a means to make the school aware of problems on campus. A litmus paper test for illegal substances is a novel idea but one which must be used responsibly.