Pubdate: Thu, 30 May 2002 Source: Star-Gazette (NY) Copyright: 2002sStar-Gazette Contact: http://www.stargazette.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1005 Author: Jeff Murray Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?159 (Drug Courts) COUNTY TO START DRUG OFFENDER COURT Program Works to Find an Alternative to Criminal System for Nonviolent Offenders. Chemung County court officials hope to get nonviolent drug offenders off a carousel of substance abuse, arrest, jail time and more substance abuse. The county is working with the New York State Unified Court System to create an adult drug treatment court, a concept that was introduced at the state level about 18 months ago. A drug court blends criminal and family court proceedings with the human services resources in the community to more effectively treat drug users rather than just recycle them through the criminal justice system, said Kathi Chaplin, project manager for New York State Drug Treatment Courts. "It brings a sense of participation and brings an opportunity for those of us in the criminal justice system to make a difference in people's lives -- a positive difference," Chaplin told a gathering of judges, lawyers, human service providers and others on Wednesday at the Chemung County Courthouse. "Drug courts save lives. Drug courts also save communities a lot of money." New York state Chief Justice Judith Kaye created the Office of Drug Court Treatment Programs in October 2000 based on the success of a pilot program in Rochester. Since that time, Kaye's staff has worked with court officials across the state to set up drug treatment courts. So far courts are up and running or in the planning stages in 59 of the 62 counties in New York. Schuyler County recently set up a drug treatment court and a similar court is in the works in Steuben County. The numbers that underscore the need for a drug court are compelling, Chaplin said. In 1980, there were 27,407 drug arrests in New York state. That number was 145,000 in 1999, she said. In addition, in 1980, 886 drug defendants were sentenced to state prison time. In 1995, that number was 70,895. State Supreme Court Justice Judith O'Shea, administrative judge for the 6th Judicial District, asked Chemung County Judge Peter Buckley to work on establishing a drug treatment court in Chemung County. "We don't intend to bring more cases in. These are the same clientele we are dealing with anyway," O'Shea said. "Drug court is not for violent offenders, and the other thing is we're not interested in dealers. It's for nonviolent offenders who are in the system because of a drug or alcohol addiction." Under the program, the only additional person needed in each county would be a state-funded coordinator, Chaplin said. Teams of prosecutors, defense attorneys and judges would evaluate each case and decide whether a particular defendant is appropriate for drug court. The program is voluntary, and the district attorney would have the final say whether the case should go to drug court or not. Once a defendant is assigned to drug court, his or her progress would be monitored by the judge, who could order jail time or other sanctions for violating conditions of the program, as well as rewards for compliance. In drug courts, prosecutors don't judge their successes by the number of convictions they earn, and defense attorneys don't aim simply to have criminal charges dropped, Chaplin said. The ultimate goal of all participants is to help the client to a drug-free, productive life, she said. To graduate from the program, clients must not take drugs or drink alcohol for a year, Chaplin said. They also must have a high school diploma or general equivalency diploma and either be employed or enrolled in a higher education program. In addition to substance abuse services, the court will help to coordinate education, financial and family counseling and health services to help clients overcome obstacles. It will take close to a year to establish the program in Chemung County, Chaplin said. All participants will take training courses offered by the state. Not everyone is sold on the program. Chemung County District Attorney John Trice is concerned about what costs might be associated with drug treatment courts, even though Chaplin assured that there would be no local costs involved. The concept is also nothing new locally, Trice said. "It's my feeling that what she's talking about is what we've been doing for years," Trice said. "The system is flexible enough that if anybody deserves treatment, we can make it happen. What we have here is more structure, more people involved in making that decision. The big question is, Is there money to fund a project like this? That will be important for our community." - --- MAP posted-by: Josh