Pubdate: Thu, 13 Jun 2002
Source: Daily Telegraph (UK)
Copyright: 2002 Telegraph Group Limited
Contact:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/114
Author: Ian Coghlan

EXTENSION OF POWERS IS UNJUSTIFIABLE

SIR - I am no stranger to the need for accurate, timely and verifiable 
intelligence, having served 19 years in a branch of the Services concerned 
with military intelligence and afterwards working on IT systems involved 
with criminal and similar intelligence.

The extensions proposed by the Government to the Regulation of 
Investigatory Powers Act are unjustifiable. The sort of intelligence that 
can be obtained from when and where phone calls have been made, e-mail 
exchanges, and which computer sites have been visited (loosely defined as 
traffic analysis) should not, and must not, be available to the 
organisations the Government wishes to extend it to. There is absolutely no 
reason why the Food Standards Agency, local authorities or any of the other 
proposed bodies need access to this type of information.

Any necessary investigations must be carried out by the police or other 
agencies that the Act already covers. The thought that a local authority, 
in particular, will obtain this sort of information is very frightening. 
Local authority staff do not receive the same level of security clearance 
and vetting as current users of this information and the opportunity for 
corruption is unlimited. Secondly, the all-encompassing reasons for 
obtaining such information mean that it would be open to abuse for 
political ends.

This Government has proved that it cannot be trusted with even the most 
basic information about individuals. Who knows what injustices and 
persecutions will follow when a politically motivated local council obtains 
information about individuals and groups with which it disagrees.

I have always justified the collection of intelligence about individuals on 
the ground that it is handled by, in the main, apolitical, cleared and 
vetted individuals with a need to know. I am no longer convinced that this 
is the case. This Act must be repealed, not extended.

From:
Ian Coghlan, Lydney, Glos
- ---
MAP posted-by: Beth