Pubdate: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 Source: Observer, The (UK) Copyright: 2002 The Observer Contact: http://www.observer.co.uk/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/315 Author: Tony Thompson Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?194 (Hutchinson, Asa) 'BRIXTON? RIGHT NOW IT'S A 24-HR CRACK SUPERMARKET' One year after the softly-softly approach to cannabis began, hard drug use is soaring. Has Paddick's experiment failed - or is the fight unwinnable? The attack happened so quickly that the young black man hardly had time to react. The five white police officers knocked him to the ground, pushed their knees into his chest and locked their arms around his neck. It was the middle of the afternoon in London's Brixton market, the area at the heart of a hugely controversial 'softly-softly' drugs experiment which has seen those caught with small amounts of cannabis facing nothing more than a telling-off. Within seconds a hostile crowd had started to gather, alarmed at what appeared to be police brutality. The officers knew they had to act quickly to prevent things from turning ugly. Once the police had the man under control, one of the officers reached into the man's mouth and removed half a dozen wraps of crack cocaine, which he held out on the palm of his hand. 'We believe this man is a crack dealer,' he explained. 'We are arresting him because we are trying to get hard drugs off the streets.' The incident took place earlier this month and a surveillance tape of the incident has been used by Chief Superintendent Brian Moore, Acting Borough Commander for Lambeth, to illustrate the state of the drug problem one year after the experiment began. The police accept that dealers are acting with absolute impunity by selling crack and other drugs in broad daylight. The dramatic police tactics are necessary because if the dealers manage to swallow the crack they keep in their mouths, officers have no way of charging them with possession. 'Many people find this film shocking,' said Moore. 'But it is the reality of what we are dealing with. The centre of Brixton is a 24-hour crack supermarket. We have 15 dealers during the day and up to 20 throughout the night. They each sell 100 rocks per week at UKP10 a time. It means the centre of Brixton alone is a crack market worth UKP12 million each year. The level of demand means that even if we arrested 1,000 dealers, they'd be replaced by 1,000 new ones the next day.' When the cannabis experiment was launched by the outspoken Metropolitan Police Commander Brian Paddick, it was hailed as a brave step by the pro-drugs lobby but seen as a blow to law and order by others who feared it would lead to a relaxation of attitudes towards harder drugs. Paddick himself said: 'I have never known anyone commit crime to fund a cannabis habit.' In recent weeks, criticism of the experiment from the community and the police themselves has risen. Locals have reported incidents of children as young as 10 under the effects of cannabis. Some children are said to have turned up at school stoned while there have been instances of children whose parents are dealers being employed as couriers and rewarded with cannabis. Last week Asa Hutchinson, Director of the US Drug Enforcement Administration, visited Brixton and pronounced the experiment a failure. He claimed that its main effect had been to encourage more people to smoke the drug and to do so more openly. There has also been criticism from within the Met. Deputy Assistant Commissioner Mike Fuller, head of Scotland Yard's drugs directorate, said there were 'significant flaws' in the experiment. Writing in the Police Review, he noted: 'Our school officers report that children feel that the police are sending mixed messages to young people by on the one hand trying to deter young people from abusing and experimenting with drugs, and yet appearing hypocritical by not strictly enforcing the drug laws.' A recent Mori poll found that while half of all white residents in Brixton supported the experiment, the majority of black and Asian residents opposed it. Fuller believes this is because the white middle classes have a rose-tinted view of drug-taking and do not see the problems that are caused in the same way as ethnic communities do. Since the experiment began last July, there has been a 13 per cent increase in the number of cannabis dealers travelling to Brixton to sell their wares. Drug dealing offences in the borough have risen by 11 per cent and recorded cases of cannabis possession by 34 per cent. What seems to most concern local people, however, is that by relaxing attitudes to cannabis, police have given a signal to all drug dealers that they have nothing to fear. 'The police have abandoned the streets to the dealers,' said Reverend Ivelaw Bowman of St Andrew's Church. 'You cannot use the bus stop at the top of Coldharbour Lane or the nearby telephone boxes because they have been taken over by the dealers. They sell drugs openly and without fear, even though you cannot move for CCTV cameras there. And it is the same people day after day. The law is not being enforced and the question everyone in the community wants an answer to is this: if we can see it, why can't the police?' In the debate over whether the Lambeth experiment has been a success or a failure, many have lost sight of what Paddick's original aims were. Some believe the experiment was simply a reflection of his personal views on cannabis. But Paddick took over the Lambeth patch soon after an independent Home Office inquiry concluded that it was an inefficient use of police resources to continue clamping down on soft drugs when Britain had the highest number of drug-related deaths in Europe. The experiment was an attempt to better manage those dwindling police resources. The situation in Lambeth, which now has the highest levels of crack abuse in Britain, was rapidly getting out of control. With 100 fewer officers in Lambeth due to cutbacks, Paddick needed a drastic solution. Arresting and charging someone with possessing a small amount of cannabis would take officers off the street for up to eight hours at a time. Paddick reasoned that if his officers no longer had to do that, they could devote more time to chasing crack dealers. The Paddick experiment was not particularly radical. After the Brixton race riots in 1981, police in the area adopted a relaxed attitude towards cannabis smoking: the chances of being arrested and prosecuted for possessing the drug were minimal. All the Paddick experiment did was formalise an arrangement that had been in place for years. Although the scheme succeeded in some ways, an investigation by The Observer has found that its impact on the crack trade has been minuscule. One problem, which becomes obvious on a walk through Brixton, is that the dealers who sell cannabis are the same dealers who sell crack. Those who approach and inquire about the softer drug are almost always offered crack instead. 'It's just good business,' said Dennis, 41, a Brixton resident who spent 15 years addicted to crack and heroin, spending up to UKP5,000 a week on his habit. 'Why sell someone UKP10 worth of cannabis and perhaps see them again in a month's time when you can sell them UKP10 worth of crack and see them three hours later for UKP10 more?' The Lambeth experiment had two aims: to free up police man-hours and to increase the number of people prosecuted for dealing Class A drugs. On both counts it has succeeded. A preliminary study by the police found that 1,350 man-hours had been liberated, the equivalent of almost two extra full-time officers. As for the number of Class A drug dealers arrested, that had increased by more than 10 per cent. But a closer examination of the numbers quickly shows that police in Brixton are fighting a losing battle to control the drug trade. The rise in Class A drug convictions is impressive as a statistic but actually amounts to just 17 additional arrests compared to the previous year. Taking Moore's own statistics about the number of dealers operating and comparing it to the number of arrests shows that a crack dealer in the centre of Brixton has only a one in 85 chance of being arrested during the course of a year. Furthermore, with current tactics requiring at least eight officers per operation, if police wanted to arrested 10 per cent of the dealers currently active in the town centre, they would need to liberate some 6,700,000 more man-hours than the 1,350 the experiment has produced so far. There are other worrying signs. The standard indicator for the size and health of any drug market is street price. When drugs are in short supply, the price goes up - when they are plentiful, it falls. Since the experiment began, the price of cannabis had climbed from UKP27 per ounce to UKP30. Over the same period of time, the price of crack cocaine has fallen. 'People complain that the dealing takes place openly, but it has always been like that,' said Dennis. 'I've been clean for two years but the dealers who are out there now are the same people who were there when I was using. Nothing has changed in that sense. The market has grown, but the way it operates is the same.' In an attempt to beat police tactics, dealers now carry fewer rocks in their mouths than they used to in order to make it easier to swallow them in the event of a raid. They have also brought in 'mouth-to-mouth' dealing where customers place the drugs in their own mouths the instant the transaction is complete. The danger this practice represents makes it impossible for undercover officers to take part in sting operations. Although street crack dealers are a major problem, chiefly because of the violence associated with them, they are only the tip of the iceberg. There are currently 74 crack houses in the Brixton area, most of them in buildings belonging to the most vulnerable members of the community. Dealers prey on the vulnerable and mentally ill and in some cases take over their properties. When a crack house is raided and shut down, the vulnerable person is left waiting for another group to arrive and resume business. Use of heroin has also spiralled in Brixton. The numbers of syringes, needles and other items associated with addicts is now so high that last week Faith Bowman, Chief Executive of Lambeth Council, announced a plan to introduce Britain's first refuse team dedicated to cleaning up drug paraphernalia. The feeling among local drug policy workers, who feel unable to speak openly, is that Paddick was allowed to carry out the experiment because the Met wanted to test public opinion before introducing the policy more widely. Paddick, not Scotland Yard, would carry the can if it all went wrong. Campaigners say the real difficulty is that Lambeth was simply the worst place to try the experiment because the problems were so extensive. Indeed, many senior police officers seem to be all but blaming Paddick's experiment for making things worse. In the latest twist, Moore is calling for new police powers to allow him to detain suspects who are believed to have swallowed crack until the drugs pass out of their systems. 'These are the powers that customs officers have. When you walk though an airport you don't see customs officers rolling around on the floor with people trying to force their mouths open, yet they deal with people who have swallowed drugs every day. They simply detain them and let nature take its course. If we had the same powers, we would be far more effective.' - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom