Pubdate: Sun, 23 Jun 2002
Source: New York Times (NY)
Section: Week in Review
Copyright: 2002 The New York Times Company
Contact:  http://www.nytimes.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/298
Author: Larry Rohter

DEEP IN BRAZIL, A FLIGHT OF PARANOID FANCY

Rio De Janeiro - Put reason aside, for a moment, and imagine this: American 
students are taught that the Amazon should be taken away from Brazil and 
made into an "international reserve" under United Nations administration. 
United States Army special forces are training in Florida to seize control 
of that zone once it is established. And, to accelerate the process, 
Harvard University advocates the immediate dismemberment of Brazil.

All of this, of course, is pure imagination. The Brazilian imagination.

 From birth, Brazilians are taught that "the Amazon is ours." But their 
government has never been able to exercise effective sovereignty over the 
region, which in any case remains an exotic mystery to most Brazilians. The 
result is a national paranoia: a conviction that outsiders - especially the 
United States, with its checkered history in Latin America - envy Brazil's 
ownership of the world's largest tropical forest and want it for themselves.

Since late last year, suspicions have been running unusually high because 
of a spurious map that appeared on Internet sites here and was quickly 
accepted as real by newspapers and radio talk show hosts. Taken from what 
was said to be a junior high school textbook used in the United States, the 
map claims that Americans have a "special mission" to wrest the Amazon from 
the eight "unintelligent and primitive" South American nations that control it.

Though the text is clearly a forgery (it is riddled with grammatical and 
spelling errors that no native English speaker would make), the controversy 
continues. Some Brazilians say the C.I.A. fabricated the map to discredit 
those who would defend the Amazon from foreign interlopers. Others don't 
care whether the map is authentic.

"The map may be a falsification, but that the United States covets the 
Amazon and wants to eliminate Brazil's sovereignty is beyond dispute," said 
Rubim Aquino, a high school history teacher here. He said he emphasizes 
that message to his students "whenever the opportunity arises."

The area the Brazilian government defines as "Amazonia Legal" occupies 60 
percent of the country's territory. But it is home to fewer than 10 percent 
of its 175 million people. And most of the population lives south of the 
river, along the coast, and has never visited the region.

"The southerner doesn't know the Amazon and disdains the region and its 
people," said Lucio Flavio Pinto, a native of the Amazon state of Para who 
is editor of "Amazon Agenda," the leading newsletter about the region. 
"There is a tendency to transfer responsibility for problems to foreigners, 
so as to placate a guilty conscience and shift blame away from a national 
state" that has long treated the area as a stepchild.

Seen from the south, the Amazon seems a cornucopia of easily extracted oil, 
minerals, timber, medicinal plants and other riches. The harsh reality, 
though, is that the few projects foreigners have undertaken in the region, 
from the Ford Company's Fordlandia rubber plantation to Volkswagen's cattle 
ranch, have all failed because operating costs in the Amazon are so high 
and infrastructure so weak.

ONE of the great villains of Brazilian history is Henry Wickham, a British 
naturalist who is accused of having stolen rubber seeds a century ago and 
spirited them off to Malaysia. That led to the collapse of an Amazon rubber 
boom that had financed the building of an opera house in Manaus and allowed 
a few Brazilian tycoons to send their laundry to be cleaned in Europe, but 
had also enslaved thousands of rubber tappers.

What Brazilians still cannot bring themselves to admit is that Wickham had 
obtained legal permits to export the seeds. As Roberto Santos's "Economic 
History of the Amazon" and other books acknowledge, British and American 
companies sought to shift rubber production elsewhere because the Brazilian 
system of production was inefficient and had roused the ire of antislavery 
campaigners.

Today, the focus of Brazilian suspicions has shifted from rubber to 
biotechnology. To cite just one example, the country is rife with rumors 
that the National Cancer Institute in Washington has clandestinely sent 
bio-prospectors to steal medicinal plants. (The institute dismisses such 
tales.)

Such mythmaking helps explain the widespread acceptance given to the 
notorious map. It appears to have originated on a Web site operated by a 
right-wing nationalist military group, but Brazil's left has also shown a 
penchant for Amazonian fantasy.

At the moment, one favorite theory has to do with "Plan Colombia," the 
American effort to bolster Colombia's fight against drug traffickers and 
Marxist guerrillas. Leftist groups here say the real objective is to give 
the United States a foothold that would allow it to seize the Brazilian 
Amazon and thus command the southern flank of Venezuela's leftist 
president, Hugo Chavez.

Then there is Sivam, a $1.5 billion Amazon radar system being installed by 
an American company. Though the project will enhance Brazil's sovereignty 
over the region by allowing it to track and intercept planes smuggling 
drugs, arms and gold, many here are certain that its actual purpose is to 
allow the United States to gather information by satellite about oil and 
mineral resources it wants to exploit.

Some of these accusations are undoubtedly spreading because Brazil is in 
the throes of a presidential election campaigns, in which calls to defend 
the Amazon always please the crowds.

Unfortunately for Americans, there is probably little that can be done to 
convince Brazilians that such accounts are simply not true. As Mr. Pinto 
noted, the Amazon has the name it does because of a delusion: the first 
Europeans to visit thought they saw one-breasted woman warriors, like those 
in Greek mythology, on horseback along the bank of the river. "The Amazon 
has always been fertile ground for fables, which gives it a prominent place 
in the collective unconscious of this country," he said. "People create 
phantoms, and it does no good to refute them." 
- ---
MAP posted-by: Beth