Pubdate: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 Source: Press & Sun Bulletin (NY) Webpage: www.pressconnects.com/sunday/opinion/stories/op062302s1131.shtml Copyright: 2002 Press & Sun Bulletin Contact: http://www.pressconnects.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/878 Author: Jay Gallagher ROCKEFELLER DRUG LAW REFORM FIZZLES ALBANY -- After big talk for years about significant revisions in the state's Rockefeller-era drug laws, efforts fizzled last week. The Senate made a last-minute proposal, endorsed by Gov. George E. Pataki, to reduce sentences for a relatively small number of people, but the Assembly rejected that idea. The laws, passed in 1973, mandate harsh sentences for selling as little as two ounces of an illegal drug like marijuana, cocaine or heroin, or possessing as little as four ounces. Those who want the law changed say it catches those who may have just been transporting drugs and have had no other violations and puts them behind bars for decades, if not the rest of their lives. And they say it jams state prisons with people who would be better off getting treatment. Opponents of reform, including most of the state's district attorneys, say that relatively few of the 7,000 people sent to prison annually on drug charges fit that category. Most are dealers or habitual users who aren't motivated to benefit from a treatment program. Talks for the last several months have centered around sentencing reductions for all non-violent drug offenders, giving judges more discretion to put violators in drug-treatment programs instead of prison, freeing some of those now in prison and expanding drug-treatment programs. Last week the Senate adopted a plan that would reduce sentences of those sentenced for the most serious crime -- A-1 felonies, or about one-half of 1 percent of those sentenced annually. The Assembly wouldn't do it, fearing that if this measure was passed pressure for broader reforms would wane. "At the beginning of the year, the governor promised to provide real reform of the Rockefeller drug law, but instead he offered a half of a percent solution," said Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, D-Manhattan. If it does eventually pass, it would give Pataki the political victory of doing something to mitigate the harshest effects of the law while not angering district attorneys by reducing their discretion on what to do with those convicted of drug offenses. Opponents of the idea see it as a ploy to give Pataki an accomplishment that will help him in his re-election fight but leave little changed a policy that hurts thousands of people. The biggest problems, those opponents say, is that it doesn't change the requirement that the crimes are measured by the weight of the drugs involved, rather than the role of the person arrested. In other words, they don't think "mules" who are merely transporting the drug, maybe unknowingly, should be treated as harshly as someone selling them. Anthony Papa of Queens was such a "mule" in 1984. He took $500 to take an envelope with four ounces of cocaine from the Bronx to Mt. Vernon. He was arrested there (he said the drug deal was part of a police sting operation) and sentenced to 15 years to life. Pataki granted him clemency in 1997. "I knew what I was getting into, what I did was wrong, but I didn't deserve to serve 15 years to life," he said. Papa was part of a group of 15 people who either served time in prison for drug offenses or who have relatives serving time who met with Pataki and Silver last week. "People make mistakes in their lives, but it doesn't mean they should spend the rest of their lives in jail," he said. The Assembly also wants to give judges more discretion by removing or reducing the mandatory sentences. Pataki, who has been courting minority voters, wants to deliver some reform, since nine out of 10 of those behind bars on drug raps in New York are African Americans or Latinos. Since he faces a challenge for the Conservative and Independence Party nominations from billionaire B. Thomas Golisano, he doesn't want to anger the state district attorneys and face a charge of being "soft on crime." So just reducing sentences for the most serious felons would seem like an ideal solution. Assembly Democrats, where the Black and Puerto Rican Caucus is a significant force, won't settle for what they consider to be a half-measure. Meanwhile, judges are still required to hand down long sentences for some first-time, non-violent drug offenders -- something nobody can brag about going into the November elections. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth