Pubdate: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 Source: Shawnee News-Star (OK) Copyright: 2002 The Shawnee News-Star Contact: http://www.news-star.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/412 Author: Mike J. McCormick, Executive Editor Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing) A MONUMENTAL DECISION Our View In a narrow 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Tecumseh School Board and its drug testing policy. This ruling is monumental and far-reaching and could impact several million students involved in extracurricular and athletic activities. The ruling, handed down Thursday, expands a 1995 decision by the court that allowed random testing of student athletes. The most recent decision will permit schools to randomly test students not only involved in athletics, but also those involved in a variety of extracurricular activities ranging from academic bowl teams, to band programs to cheerleading and others. The court, in its ruling this week, stopped short, however, of allowing random testing for any student, regardless of whether or not that student is involved in extracurricular activities. Several justices reportedly have indicated they would like the opportunity to address that issue as well. The court was heavily divided on this drug testing issue as the 5-4 vote would indicate. If even one of the justices had voted differently the decision would have a completely different impact. This had to be a difficult ruling for the Supreme Court justices. It was equally, or possibly more, so for the Tecumseh School Board to make when it first began defending its policy and the ultimate decision to take it to the highest court in the land. Some of those who oppose this decision probably will support some of the statements from the dissenting Supreme Court justices who labeled it unreasonable, capricious and even perverse. However, schools around the country face difficulties today in dealing with students who use and sell illegal drugs. Whether a high percentage of those involved with drugs participate in athletics and extracurricular activities may be unknown. Our guess would be there are some, but there is probably less drug use among these student groups than those who are not involved in athletics and extracurricular activities. Still, the students who participate in these are expected to uphold a certain standard as they represent a school district. We support Thursday's ruling handed down by the court. It won't be popular in the face of many, especially those who have a tendency to buy, sell and use illegal drugs. But, this monumental decision by the court could have a dramatic impact on assisting school districts throughout the nation as they deal with drug usage. School administrators need all the tools they can to confront these problems and we hope they utilize this decision that enhances their capabilities to do so but with proper restraint. - --- MAP posted-by: Ariel