Pubdate: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 Source: Free Press, The (NC) Copyright: 2002 Kinston Free Press Contact: http://www.kinston.com/Contact.cfm Website: http://www.kinston.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1732 FBI-MILITARY ALLIANCE BEARS WATCHING One can understand the impulse to want to eliminate red tape and get the job done. But a New York Times story detailing a closer-than-ever working relationship between the U.S. military and the FBI in the effort to hunt down suspected al-Qaida operatives in Pakistan nonetheless raises some red flags. The traditionally independent military and civilian law enforcement agencies are cooperating in Pakistan even more than in the drug war, where the lines of authority previously have been blurred. The experiment in cooperation in Pakistan is seen as a possible model for similar anti-terrorist activities in the Philippines, Yemen and elsewhere. There is some disagreement as to how closely FBI agents are working with Pakistani police in tracking al-Qaida suspects. Pakistani officials tell reporters that FBI agents have gone along on raids. American officials say the FBI role is more limited, that the FBI agents develop and hand over intelligence information to local officials who then take action. However the new model is working, it bears watching. Until very recently - notably the objectionable FBI expansion overseas under former director Louis Freeh - the FBI was seen as a domestic law enforcement agency. There are serious questions as to whether the FBI should be operating in Pakistan or other foreign countries at all. It is also worth remembering that maintaining a separation between military and civilian law enforcement has been an important safeguard of liberty in the United States. "We've seen an enormous escalation of military involvement in domestic affairs related to the drug war," University of California-Irvine Professor Gilbert Geis said in a newspaper interview. "I'm not sure if FBI involvement in what seems like an essentially military intelligence operation in Pakistan is a healthy development." A desire to eliminate bureaucratic barriers to sharing intelligence and information is understandable and probably to the good. But blurring lines of responsibility between civilian and military agencies carries potential dangers for liberty. - --- MAP posted-by: Terry Liittschwager