Pubdate: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 Source: Daytona Beach News-Journal (FL) Copyright: 2002 News-Journal Corp Contact: http://www.n-jcenter.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/700 PAINFUL LEGISLATION Sen. Burt's Bills Would Contribute To Drug Hsyteria It takes a vivid imagination to come up with a label like "the poor man's heroin" -- and then apply it to a legal drug. Unfortunately, the trouble caused by the prescription pain reliever OxyContin is all too real. OxyContin is a powerful time-release formula of the painkiller oxycodone. It's been hailed as a breakthrough for people who suffer chronic pain -- and targeted as the new Big Bad in this country's long-standing and futile war on drugs. As a result doctors are afraid to prescribe the drug, creating pointless suffering for people who legitimately need it. The Legislature should think very carefully before contributing to this hysteria. First, the numbers. The Florida Medical Examiner's Commission says OxyContin deaths are on the increase. In the first six months of 2001, medical examiners found lethal levels of oxycodone, the main ingredient in OxyContin, or hydrocodone, a similar drug, in 217 cases. That represents a 65-death increase from the last half of 2000. It's an area for concern -- but also perspective. In the same six- month period, more than 2,400 Floridians died from lethal doses of illegal drugs, including cocaine and heroin. It's also important to note that the number of legal prescriptions for OxyContin increased hugely through the first half of 2001, which must play a factor in the number of deaths. That doesn't mean the dangers of Oxycontin should be brushed off. It's a powerful and potentially dangerous drug -- especially when it's abused. But the measures proposed by Sen. Locke Burt, R-Ormond Beach, go much too far. Burt is sponsoring three bills (SB 636, 638 and 640). They include worthy measures, like increased physician training on the dangers of prescribing OxyContin, and changes in the physical mechanics of prescribing drugs -- such as better record-keeping by doctors and state-issued, tamper-proof prescription pads. These are more troubling, because similar measures have been enough in other states to chill doctors' willingness to prescribe. But there are far more disturbing provisions. First, the bill would levy felony charges against doctors accused of "excessive or inappropriate" prescribing of any controlled drug. The potential problems for doctors are staggering: Who decides what's appropriate and what's not? The wording is vague enough to cause many doctors to hesitate -- and sometimes say no. The problem is exacerbated by the American medical establishment's traditional reluctance to consider pain as a serious problem in its own right. Many older patients are reluctant to insist that chronic pain be treated, for fear of being seen as "whining," and many doctors still share that view. Making matters even worse, Burt wants to create a statewide database that would include the names and addresses of every patient who has a prescription for any one of dozens of drugs. If Burt's bill becomes law, the name of every schoolchild taking Ritalin will be listed, as will thousands of cancer patients. It goes too far, and there's no justification for the potential violation of privacy. Of the roughly 100 other drugs listed in Schedules II and III, none has been identified in lethal doses in Florida patients. Members of the Senate Health, Aging and Longterm Care Committee seem to have their doubts as well. They stalled discussion of Burt's bills last week, and he says he plans to consider amendments before re- presenting them this week. That's good. But a better course would be to drop the issue entirely and stop feeding into the hype that is denying access to a legal and effective drug to people in real pain. - --- MAP posted-by: manny lovitto