Pubdate: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 Source: Toronto Star (CN ON) Copyright: 2002 The Toronto Star Contact: http://www.thestar.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/456 Author: Wayne Phillips, http://www.mapinc.org/writers/Wayne+Phillips Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v02/n1446/a04.html Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) GOVERNMENT SHOULD REGULATE, NOT DECRIMINALIZE, POT Re Where there's smoke, there's disagreement, National Report, Aug. 3. It never ceases to amaze me that, in spite of the fact that neither cannabis users nor cannabis itself have ever lived up to the negative connotations spewed by prohibitionists, politicians and police, zero tolerance of cannabis and its users continues. Decriminalization is a poor substitute for the regulation of cannabis, because it would not address the multitude of problems inherent with prohibition. Opponents of legalization, busy promoting pseudo-science, flawed and contrived studies, phony moralisms and outright fabrications, are quick to spout off about concerns for youth, cannabis and mixed messages. However, those concerns are about as short-lived as the examples they set for youth. One has only to view any newspaper across Canada to realize this. The responsible thing for government to do is regulate cannabis in a manner similar to the way in which it regulates alcohol. That way, those under the age of majority would have a difficult, if not impossible, time obtaining cannabis. There would be very few, if any, lucrative residential marijuana grow operations and the prohibition-related hydro fraud problem would also virtually disappear, as would the risk of faulty grow operations and the potential for harm thereof. Prominent U.S. researcher John P. Morgan of the City University of New York Medical School, told a U.S. Senate committee that smoking marijuana does not seem to cause lung cancer, emphysema or cause birth anomalies in fetuses. "We are some 30 to 40 years into this marijuana epidemic and still have not seen evidence of pulmonary cancer in marijuana smokers," Morgan testified. Morgan scoffed at the theory that marijuana is a gateway leading to hard drugs. Statistics show that most marijuana smokers never go on to other drugs, he said. "There is no gateway; there is no credible gateway theory." Just as increased THC levels simply mean those who use cannabis would, in fact, have to use less to achieve the desired effect. No one in his or her right mind can argue that prohibition is not a hornet's nest of unmitigated corruption posing as a societal safeguard; it is a red herring, politically and otherwise. Until legislators comprehend that and move to end cannabis prohibition, in spite of prohibitionist sentiment, Canadians will continue to be systemically discriminated against and Canada will continue to be diminished in the process. Wayne Phillips Hamilton - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake