Pubdate: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 Source: Oregonian, The (OR) Copyright: 2002 The Oregonian Contact: http://www.oregonlive.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/324 Author: Dr. Linn Goldberg Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing) Note: Dr. Linn Goldberg is professor of medicine and head of the Division of Health Promotion and Sports Medicine at Oregon Health & Science University. STUDENT DRUG-TEST STUDY WILL PROVIDE INVALUABLE DATA Drug Testing Happens. In a nutshell, that is the status quo, despite the wishes of The Oregonian ("Stop drug research on Oregon kids," July 8). The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the legality of drug testing of high school athletes in an Oregon case in 1995 and in June expanded that ruling to include high school students participating in any extracurricular (voluntary) activities. Although legal, no one knows whether drug testing reduces drug use. Does testing help students resist drugs or is it a big waste of money? That is the basis of the Saturn study led by myself and colleagues from Oregon Health & Science University. Many schools drug-test athletes without questioning effectiveness. So, why should we or anyone else care, since it is now a legal option? Currently, substance abuse causes more deaths, illnesses and disabilities than any other preventable health condition, costing over $160 billion a year in the United States. Teen-agers are most vulnerable, and high schools haven't had effective programs to deter drug use. The 2001 Oregon Healthy Teens Survey showed widespread drug and alcohol use among high school students. Substance abuse among young athletes is similar, with even greater use of steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs. Sadly, almost 14 percent of Oregon teen-agers said they had been drunk at school within the past three months. Although some negative public sentiment has been directed toward the Saturn study, that opinion might be best used to change public school policy or to assist in more compelling legal challenges. To clarify the Saturn project: We are studying seven schools that have developed a legal policy of drug testing and comparing them to six schools that have deferred drug testing for three years. Our study is a voluntary survey of those students: Students are asked to complete a questionnaire to determine whether the fact that their school has (or does not have) random drug testing for athletes has any effect on their use of drugs or alcohol, as well as what they think about drug testing. Student-athletes and their parents are given a consent form before they complete the questionnaire and informed the survey is completely voluntary. Most complete the survey; some don't. We confidentially report the results. No student is identified from the survey. This is their opportunity to voice their opinion. If substance use is revealed, it is considered a medical problem, evaluated and treated. Results are handled like an abnormality revealed during the mandatory physical examination. Findings are not part of a student's record, and there are no school suspensions based on positive drug tests. After the recent Supreme Court ruling, we can be sure that drug testing will pop up in more schools. In fact, the only way drug testing might fall from favor is if it is proven to be ineffective, and so far ours is the only study asking that question. There is a substance abuse problem in our schools. Drug testing may or may not be an answer. But unless we ask the question we will never know. - --- MAP posted-by: Doc-Hawk