Pubdate: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 Source: Athens News, The (OH) Copyright: 2002, Athens News Contact: http://www.athensnews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1603 Author: Jim White, http://www.mapinc.org/writers/Jim+White Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v02/n1450/a03.html Related: Ohio Campaign for New Drug Policies http://www.ohiodrugreform.org/ Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?206 (Ohio Campaign for New Drug Policies) OHIO PRISONS CHIEF OPPOSES DRUG TREATMENT ISSUE FOR OBVIOUS REASONS Let me get this right. Reginald A. Wilkinson, director of the largest state employer, the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, which employs one in four state employees, opposes an initiative that would provide drug treatment instead of prison time for first- and second-time non-violent drug offenders? Do we really expect a person whose job directly depends on prisoners to be in favor of something that might jeopardize his job as well as that of his co-workers? Mr. Wilkinson estimates that 75 to 85 percent of prisoners have drug problems. So, what if most of those prisoners were provided drug treatment the first or second time they were caught? Would the ODRC still account for 25 percent of the state work force? I think not, and I'm fairly certain Mr. Wilkinson and his co-workers are well aware of this fact. So the real question here is whether the director of the ODRC is making a decision based on the benefit to society the drug treatment initiative will generate or is he more concerned with keeping his job and those of his co-workers? Thirty years of lock 'em up policy has produced what can best be referred to as the "prison industrial complex," where prisons have become a full-fledged industry that many people have come to rely on for employment. It's like asking auto workers if everyone really needs a car. We're sacrificing entire human lives for jobs, and that must come to an end. The drug treatment initiative is a step in that direction. Jim White Oregon, Ohio - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake