Pubdate: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 Source: Centre Daily Times (PA) Copyright: 2002 Nittany Printing and Publishing Co., Inc. Contact: http://www.centredaily.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/74 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mdma.htm (Ecstasy) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/raves.htm (Raves) THE CORRECT WAY TO DEAL WITH ECSTASY State Sen. Jake Corman, R-Bellefonte, is taking the right course by pushing for tougher penalties for selling Ecstasy, the mood-altering drug responsible the death of former Penn State student Stephanie Yau last November. Unfortunately, the U.S. Senate, also wanting to look tough on ecstasy, is going overboard. Tough sanctions against dealers is one thing, but the Senate has a bill that would be akin to shutting down bars in an effort to end drunk driving. The federal bill would reach beyond the sellers of the drug to go after the sponsors of raves, the high-intensity dance parties where Ecstasy is frequently used. The cleverly named "Reducing Americans' Vulnerability to Ecstasy Act of 2002" -- the RAVE Act, for short -- would "prohibit an individual from knowingly opening, maintaining, managing, controlling, renting, leasing, making available for use, or profiting from" a place or event where illegal drugs are sold or used. This legislation would subject violators to civil fines of up to $250,000 plus injunctive damages. If the bill essentially stopped there, it would hardly raise an eyebrow. For years, local and federal drug enforcement officials have used a similar law to crack down on property owners who either failed to take action to prevent their properties from being turned into "crack houses" or actually took payments from known drug dealers. It has proven to be an essential tool for rooting out some of the conditions in which drug dealing and related crimes fester. But the bill goes on to so tightly weave the use of illegal drugs to raves that to go after one would be to go after the other. The bill makes such statements as "each year, tens of thousands of young people are initiated into the drug culture at 'rave' parties" and that the use of Ecstasy and other "club drugs" is "deeply embedded in the rave culture." It even says that "many rave promoters go to great lengths to try to portray their events as alcohol-free parties that are safe places for young adults to go to dance with friends, and some even go so far as to hire off-duty, uniformed police officers to patrol outside of the venue to give parents the impression that the event is safe." If an enterprising congressman had introduced a bill 30 years ago that said that because there is heavy marijuana use at outdoor concerts, the organizers of such concerts and the owners of the land where they are held should be subject to crushing fines, the common sense that that would be no better than using an anti-aircraft missile to shoot geese would have prevailed. The RAVE bill, however, already has gone through the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by the usually level- headed Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del. Critical thinking appears to have been suspended. Yes, there are problems with raves and with unscrupulous promoters who facilitate illegal and life-threatening activities or look the other way when they take place. Those people should be punished but not with this bill. Raves do not need to be virtually banished to get at the problem of Ecstasy. What certainly needs to happen -- in addition to a heavy investment in education and other prevention efforts -- is that the weight of the law must fall heavily on those who would sell this poison to our youth. Corman's bill sets jail terms that range from up to five years in prison and a $15,000 fine for persons selling more than 50 tablets of the drug to a maximum of 15 years in prison and a $250,000 fine for more than 1,000 tablets or 300 grams. Unlike the poorly conceived bill going through the Senate, efforts in the General Assembly to toughen Ecstasy penalties have moved more slowly. They deserve better. Corman's bill goes after the right target: those who peddle illegal drugs. - --- MAP posted-by: Terry Liittschwager