Pubdate: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 Source: Charlotte Observer (NC) Copyright: 2002 The Charlotte Observer Contact: http://www.charlotte.com/mld/observer/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/78 Author: Cristina C. Breen CAROLINAS CONSIDER MONITORS FOR DRUGS OxyContin Abuse Prompts Both States To Seek Closer Scrutiny Several N.C. lawmakers and the head of the N.C. Department of Health and Human Services say the state needs a prescription drug monitoring program to reduce the abuse of prescription drugs such as OxyContin. Lawmakers in both North Carolina and South Carolina say they're interested in starting a program. Such programs are helping reduce prescription drug abuse in some other states. But Carolinas officials say they're hesitant to start any new initiatives during a year when they're cutting jobs and programs to balance a $1.5 billion revenue shortfall. N.C. Secretary of Health and Human Services Carmen Hooker Odom said she's examining how to set up a monitoring program. But, she said, "The question is, does the General Assembly say this is a top priority and will it mandate that you do it and give you the money, or not give you the money?" Seventeen states use a computer database to flag patients who visit different doctors or pharmacies for the same drug, or get suspicious amounts of it. "There should be ... a system that's in place that can trigger bells and whistles and red flags when there seems to be an inappropriate use of a drug," said Sen. Fountain Odom, D-Mecklenburg, who is married to Hooker Odom. But he said a proposal for a program launched during the budget crisis would be shot down because of the state's rocky finances. S.C. Attorney General Charlie Condon said he is looking into getting federal money to start a program. The soonest a bill could be introduced in either state is January, when both legislatures return. A program could cost the states little or nothing to start, because the U.S. Department of Justice has pledged a total of $2 million in grants to help set up programs. But N.C. lawmakers say they're worried about maintaining it. It's unclear how much a program would cost, because the price would depend on several factors, including how much technology the system would use and whether new staff would be needed to run it. A Charlotte Observer investigation published in July found that OxyContin abuse may have caused or contributed to at least 97 overdose deaths in the Carolinas in 2000 and 2001. In most cases, other drugs or alcohol may have been involved. OxyContin, introduced in 1996, is an effective drug for patients with severe pain because it provides long-lasting, powerful relief without negative side effects, unlike other prescription narcotics. But abusers discovered that crushing the tablets disables the drug's patented time-release formula, releasing 12 hours of narcotic at once. Law enforcement and the medical community have faced the challenge of how to crack down on abuse of OxyContin without limiting the supply of the drug to those who need it. N.C. Reps. Dan Blue and Robert Hensley proposed starting a monitoring system last year, but the measure died before coming to a vote in the General Assembly. Hensley said it failed because of some lawmakers' concerns that a program would unfairly burden small pharmacies that don't have enough workers to keep track of patients' records and report them to the state. "The impetus for it was the OxyContin problem," Hensley said. Bill Purcell, a doctor who chairs the N.C. Senate Health Committee, is concerned about rapidly increasing health-care costs and says a monitoring program could keep Medicaid costs down by catching abusers. North Carolina's Medicaid program is already tackling the expensive problem of prescription drug abuse by Medicaid patients. Since March, doctors must get permission from the state before prescribing OxyContin and other widely abused drugs to a Medicaid patient. The number of OxyContin prescriptions paid for by Medicaid has dropped 30 percent. The maker of OxyContin, Conn.-based Purdue Pharma, supports a prescription drug monitoring program. It has successfully lobbied for the program in other states in recent years. Purdue's senior medical director, J. David Haddox, suggests a program: . Be administered by state health officials instead of law enforcement. . Monitor all controlled drugs. . Take pains to protect patient confidentiality. . Allow law enforcement officials access only if they have the name of a specific person they're investigating. Critics say the responsibility to update the system would fall on busy pharmacists, and would be impossible for small pharmacies with small staffs and little technology. "Mom and pop operations struggle as it is ... and, ultimately, they're the ones who are going to be responsible," said Rep. Wilma Sherrill, R-Buncombe, who has spoken out against a prescription monitoring program. Hensley and other proponents argue that all pharmacies have access to computers and it would not require much time or resources to contribute information for a monitoring system. In South Carolina, Rep. Tracy Edge, R-Horry, said cutting down on fake Medicaid claims is a powerful argument: "Number one, it would help with fraud at the state level. Number two, it would save people who would otherwise get addicted." But S.C. Rep. Joe Brown, chairman of the Medical, Military, Public and Municipal Affairs committee, said he's heard no talk of it among other lawmakers. "I definitely think it'd be worthwhile, but I haven't given much thought to it," Brown said. In March, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration head Asa Hutchinson asked state attorneys general to consider starting prescription monitoring programs in their states. Condon, the S.C. attorney general, said he's looking for ways to start a monitoring program through the state's Department of Health and Environmental Control. "State governments need to have in place long-range plans to deal with problems" relating to the abuse of prescription drugs, Condon said. Loy Ingold, special agent in charge of the N.C. State Bureau of Investigation's statewide diversion and environmental crimes unit, said a prescription monitoring program "is much needed in North Carolina," because it would limit the illegal prescription drug trade and help physicians root out patients who are duping them. Ingold said his division would take initiative in applying for grants to start up a program, if lawmakers would support it by passing legislation creating a program. Nevada health officials started a program five years ago that has been touted as one of the nation's best. Doctors and pharmacists who want information about a patient can fax a signed letter to the board of pharmacy and days later they are mailed a list of the doctors the patient has seen and prescriptions the patient received. Then it's up to doctors to take action if a patient appears to be "doctor shopping" by going to many different doctors seeking the same drugs, or bouncing from pharmacy to pharmacy seeking the same prescription. Nevada's system also works in another way. If a patient sees more than 10 doctors, 10 pharmacies, or gets more than 600 doses of a medication (usually pills) in 60 days, the computer system sends out an alert. Five years ago, the drug buyers flagged by the computer system filled an average of 159 prescriptions in 12 months, saw 22 doctors and bought 9,351 pills. Last year, drug buyers flagged by the monitoring system filled an average of 54 prescriptions, saw 12 doctors and bought 3,000 pills, indicating that authorities are able to find violators quicker, before they visit more doctors and get more pills. Keith MacDonald, executive secretary to the Nevada State Board of Pharmacy, said the population that benefits the most from the program is "the doctors and pharmacists who are being pestered by these people." Once doctors know patients are abusing the system, "they can cut it off right away and not be failed or duped by them," MacDonald said. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Stevens