Pubdate: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 Source: Log Cabin Democrat (AR) Copyright: 2002 The Log Cabin Democrat Contact: http://thecabin.net/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/548 Author: Tammy Keith GREENE NOT SHY ABOUT CASTING TIE-BREAKING VOTE School Board to Reconsider Drug Testing For Extracurricular Students Tuesday Conway school board member Gary Greene said Wednesday he is "70 percent sure" how he will vote on the drug-testing issue. He isn't saying what way that is, however. The board reached an impasse with a 3-3 vote Tuesday night on the proposed drug-testing policy after hearing from patrons supporting and opposing it. Greene was absent from the meeting because he was in Washington on business with Winrock International. The board will meet at 6 p.m. Tuesday in the administration building to vote on the issue again. "I was quite surprised at the coincidence that it was locked up three to three," Greene said in a telephone interview from Washington. "I don't like being in this position, but that's what I'm elected to do. "I've been under the gun before," he added. Following the vote, several people at the board meeting referred to Greene as "that poor man" who was going to be getting lots of telephone calls to sway his vote. Greene laughed when he heard that description, and said he would not take his telephone off the hook. "I've been thinking about it and researching it," Greene said. "The board has dwelled on this a long time. This has not been a decision taken lightly. There are pros and cons on both sides." Although Greene and the other board members unanimously approved a drug policy in March 2001, he said "we've gotten a lot more input" since placing that policy on hold. "I'll be willing to break the tie." Parent Larry Edwards, who supports random drug testing, questioned why the board didn't just wait until Greene was in town to take the vote. Dr. Terry Fiddler, president of the board, was surprised at the tie vote. "I promise you, if I'd known it was 3 and 3, we wouldn't have had the vote. I really thought it wouldn't even be close." Fiddler voted against the policy for "several reasons." He said, "I'm not convinced the evidence is there that drug testing works. I don't think we're testing the right group." He said students in extracurricular activities would be tested, while an uninvolved student "is sitting over there with a smug grin" that he is doing drugs and not being tested. Fiddler said the board is "looking hard" at a K-12 prevention and intervention program to introduce as soon as possible. He said it will be something "a lot more hands-on than DARE," which has been criticized for not working. Steve Fulmer, who was the superintendent when the policy was first adopted in 2001, said he was "a little bit surprised" by the vote. The first policy was adopted, but "it was called to our attention by a patron that there was a case pending in the Supreme Court." This summer the Supreme Court ruled that students in extracurricular activities could be drug tested. "I know these board members personally and they will vote their convictions, and I respect every one of them for voting their convictions. You have to give them credit for doing their homework and researching this," Fulmer said. He said a survey was done on Conway students' drug use by a company in Colorado. "We felt like we had a drug problem, but we felt like we needed some empirical evidence." He said the survey confirmed there is a problem in the Conway School District. "It crossed socio-economic lines and crossed extracurricular activities," he said. Fulmer still believes a drug policy is a good idea, but, "I think it's time to move forward." - --- MAP posted-by: Alex