Pubdate: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 Source: Sault Star, The (CN ON) Copyright: 2002 The Sault Star Contact: http://www.saultstar.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1071 Author: Frank Dobrovnik LOCAL ACTIVIST 'FLOORED' BY SUGGESTION TO LEGALIZE POT Local News - The Senate recommendation that Canada legalize marijuana for anyone 16 and over went further than even many pot activists and the health community advocated for. The operator of Sault Ste. Marie's Planetary Pride and organizer of the annual Hempfest weekend was "a little bit flabbergasted" by Wednesday's report from the Senate committee charged with studying Canada's marijuana laws. "It almost floored me, actually. I was expecting recommendations to decriminalize (and put) a fine structure in place," said Rob Waddell, who e-mailed the committee a letter supporting legalization when it sought public input. In a series of sweeping recommendations, the committee said cannabis should be legally available to anyone over 16 and pressed for an amnesty to as many as 600,000 Canadians who have criminal records for possession of the drug. Even Waddell agrees some control measures should be in place, similar to provincial agencies that monitor alcohol sold to the public. "Instead of the LCBO, we could have the CCBO - the Cannabis Control Board of Ontario." The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health made submissions to the committee last year advocating the decriminalization of marijuana - which would let people possess and use small quantities of cannabis without facing a criminal record - along with more public education on its health effects and treatment. Also Thursday, Justice Minister Martin Cauchon was quoted as saying legalizing marijuana is "just not possible from an international point of view" but decriminalizing might be a "first step" in reforming drug laws. Cauchon said he'll have a new policy ready early next year, but first he wants to see the report of a Commons committee which has been studying the issue of illicit drugs. That report is expected in November. Dr. Patrick Smith, CAMH vice-president of clinical programs, head of the addiction psychology program at the University of Toronto, said public health policy around cannabis use needs to change because "Current strategies don't seem to be yielding any positive effects," such as deterring youths from using or getting treatment for those who need it. "While marijuana is not a benign drug, just as alcohol or tobacco aren't benign drugs, it's clear that many people who use cannabis do so without serious or negative consequences," Smith said from Toronto Thursday. "We do not support the smoking of marijuana, saying it's completely risk-free, but that's exactly why we focus on decriminalization . . . The criminalization of marijuana has continued to focus on enforcement of criminal behaviour rather than when its use becomes problematic. We should be focusing on the stuff we do have evidence works, and that's effective prevention and health programs." That approach is in line with the Sault-based Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police. On its Web site, OACP came out against "any type of legalization of any and all current illicit drugs in Canada" but "would entertain any government initiative to decriminalize (conviction doesn't give rise to a criminal record) certain offences related to the possession of small amounts of marijuana . . . with the proviso that there be corresponding initiatives instituted by the government, including a balance of prevention, education, enforcement, counselling, treatment, rehabilitation and diversion programs . . ." The Sault Ste. Marie Police Service has consistently laid fewer cannabis-related charges since 1999, and fewer drug charges overall since at least 1997. Last year 150 cannabis-related charges were laid, compared with 178 in 2000 and 201 the year before. Police Chief Bob Davies and deputy chief Bob Kates were out of town and not available for comment Thursday. Waddell predicts the Commons committee will take a similar stance to the Senate and decriminalization will follow "probably next year," with full legalization within five years if the federal government doesn't bow to U.S. pressure. "How far the government will go is hard to say. There's going to be a tremendous amount of pressure from south of the border. The United States does not want to give up its war on drugs." - --- MAP posted-by: Alex