Pubdate: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 Source: San Jose Mercury News (CA) Copyright: 2002 San Jose Mercury News Contact: http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/390 Author: Tim Johnson, Knight Ridder Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/coke.htm (Cocaine) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?208 (Environmental Issues) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/areas/Colombia (Colombia) REPORT ON COCA SPRAYING IN COLOMBIA CRITICIZED WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration told Congress on Thursday that its program of aerially spraying herbicide on coca crops in Colombia may cause eye irritation to farmers on the ground but poses no other significant health or environmental risks. The 180-page report, which watchdog groups criticized as flawed, came as U.S. officials hope to intensify aerial spraying in Colombia to battle the illegal narcotics industry. "We believe that this is an extremely important program and that we will achieve positive results by the end of the year," said Paul Simons, acting assistant secretary of state for international narcotics matters. The State Department report certified that Secretary of State Colin Powell had found that chemicals used in the U.S.-financed aerial eradication program pose no "unreasonable risks or adverse affects" to humans or the environment in Colombia. It said the program meets U.S. regulatory standards and is conducted in a way to address complaints of citizens who claim their health or their crops have been harmed. The aerial spraying has generated more than 1,000 complaints from Colombians who say their food crops have been damaged or their health affected by the herbicide. Since 1994, U.S. officials have financed efforts to spray a substance containing glyphosate -- the most widely used conventional herbicide in the United States -- on illegal coca and poppy crops in Colombia. While other countries in the Andean region prohibit the aerial spraying, it has become a cornerstone of U.S. anti-drug efforts in Colombia, source of most of the world's cocaine. Sen. Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat who sponsored the language requiring the State Department to certify the safety of the program, assailed the report. "Spraying a toxic chemical over large areas, including where people live and livestock graze, would not be tolerated in our country. We should not be spraying first and asking questions later," Leahy said. The State Department report included separate assessments by the Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency. "Glyphosate poses minimal health risks to humans and animals, is environmentally benign, and degrades rapidly in soil and water," Agriculture Secretary Ann M. Veneman said in a letter to Powell included in the report. But the EPA was far more cautious, even critical in its assessment, noting that it had not been able to conduct direct research in Colombia and relied only on data provided by the State Department, which is deeply vested in the success of ongoing counternarcotics programs. Aerial application of the herbicide and inert substances that help it stick to the waxy leaves of coca plants may cause "acute eye irritation" in humans, drift onto "non-target plants," and have different reactions in Colombia's tropical ecosystem than in the temperate climates of the United States, the EPA said. - --- MAP posted-by: Jackl