Pubdate: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 Source: Sunday Herald, The (UK) Copyright: 2002 Sunday Herald Contact: http://www.sundayherald.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/873 Author: Timothy Pratt Cited: Nevadans for Responsible Law Enforcement ( www.nrle.org ) Cited: Marijuana Policy Project ( www.mpp.org ) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/findUKP162 (Nevadans for Responsible Law Enforcement) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/findUKP163 (Question 9 (NV)) DOPE VOTE LIGHTS UP LAS VEGAS Through a thickening haze of arguments, Nevada voters do battle to legalise pot for private use. Timothy Pratt reports from Las Vegas As the fall elections draw near in this non-presidential year, an unlikely battleground in America's war on drugs has appeared in the middle of the desert, like a shifting mirage -- Las Vegas. Home to 1.4 million of Nevada's two million residents, the city's greater metropolitan area has the chance, come November 5, to vote on what would be the most far-reaching reform to America's drug laws since marijuana was made illegal in 1937. 'A lot is at stake here,' said Krissy Oechslin, spokeswoman for the Washington-based Marijuana Policy Project, the organisation putting up more than $1 million to mount Nevada's campaign. 'People are looking at this to see if the reform of marijuana laws is possible nationwide.' Arguing that the police are too busy chasing reefer when they could be chasing robbers, a group, calling itself Nevadans For Responsible Law Enforcement, convinced more than 100,000 of the state's citizens to place a question on the ballot that would legalise possession of less than three ounces of marijuana and earn the state taxes from its regulated sale to adults over 21. The number of signatures gained in July's 100!F heat broke records in the quick-growing state's political history, said Billy Rogers, director of the campaign. Early polls showed a near-even split. Then, in a move that caught observers by surprise, the Nevada Conference of Police and Sheriffs (NCOPS), the state's law enforcement organisation, announced its support for the initiative. 'Violent crime is on the rise and terrorism remains a real threat,' said Andy Anderson, the organisation's president. Our priorities have changed and, with our limited resources, so should our laws.' In a matter of days, police accused Anderson of misinterpreting the will of his members. NCOPS reversed its position and Anderson resigned. By this time question nine had attracted national attention from the media and the federal government. Nevada has already seen reform of the marijuana laws. By popular vote in 2000, it one of nine states where it is legal for patients with a doctor's prescription to use the drug for medical purposes and, in the process, reduced penalties for possession of less than an ounce. But these laws have pitted the feds against these states, as buying and selling marijuana remains illegal. It came to a head last week when federal Drug Enforcement Administration officials raided a California farm that grows marijuana for the ill. They were answered by a city hall smoke-in of the sick, joined by the local mayor and officials (who didn't light up). On Tuesday, the nation's so-called drug tsar, John Walters, announced he would visit Nevada on October 9 and 10 to lobby against question nine. 'I am going into every state that has a ballot initiative and working with people in community coalitions,' Walters, director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, told a Las Vegas newspaper. This, said Oechslin, may be the campaign's biggest obstacle. 'We're going up against the federal government, which has unlimited money to uphold drug policy,' she said. Last week Walters's office launched the latest instalment of a five-year-old anti-drug advertising campaign which costs taxpayers $180m a year. Allen St Pierre, executive director of the National Organisation for the Reform of Marijuana Laws -- the nation's oldest and largest such group, founded in 1970 -- said the feds might have left the state alone if the measure only sought decriminalisation, but will pull out all the stops to prevent Nevada from regulating marijuana sales. 'I just don't think the idea of the state distributing marijuana will withstand federal pressure,' he said. At the same time, he said Nevada was as good a place as any to try. 'If you were to choose where to do this, Nevada is the right place. It enjoys a reputation for vice, tourism and, what is described in Washington, as Western libertarianism.' The epicentre of vice -- at least in the minds of nearly 40 million tourists yearly -- is the several miles of casinos known as the Strip. At its September meeting, the State Board of Health's chairman, Joey Villaflor, explained why he was against question nine. 'Can you imagine -- the Strip would be flooded with marijuana!' To Rogers this is the biggest obstacle facing the initiative -- 'the lies of the opposition'. The measure clearly states that marijuana smoking would still be illegal in public, including the Strip's casinos. 'This is about what people do in the privacy of their own homes,' he said. In the end, it is the state's voters who must peer through the thickening haze of arguments. If a majority approves the question, it must get a yes vote again in 2004 to become law. Anecdotally it appears that more college-aged Nevadans are registering to vote than ever before -- perhaps to send out the message they want to light up and be left alone. 'A group of orange-haired kids with piercings everywhere came in and wanted to register people just to vote for this question,' said Larry Lomax, registrar with the Clark County board of elections. 'It's definitely going to be interesting,' said St Pierre. But he admits he is not optimistic. 'I think, given a straight-up, non-politicised vote, up to 58% of voters would support this. But the truth is, this issue is over-politicised to the extent few issues are in this country.' - --- MAP posted-by: Beth