Pubdate: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 Source: Daily News, The (CN NS) Copyright: 2002 The Daily News Contact: http://www.canada.com/halifax/dailynews/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/179 Author: Wayne Phillips PRISONER'S POT DEPRIVATION UNJUST To the editor: Re: Judge: Outcomes 'Inevitably' Disappoint, The Daily News, Sept. 20: When Nova Scotia Supreme Court Justice Joe Kennedy stated, "Perfect justice is not to be found in this courtroom; it's not to be found, perhaps, on this planet," he wasn't kidding. One particular case that is troubling is that of Michael Patriquen, who was sentenced to a six-year period of incarceration in a federal penitentiary by Nova Scotia Supreme Court Justice Suzanne Hood for conspiracy to possess "cannabis marijuana" for the purposes of trafficking. Patriquen is a Category 2 Spinal Cord OCMA exemptee, for whom cannabis was confirmed as the appropriate treatment for his condition by Dr. M. Lynch of the Pain Management Unit at the QEII Health Sciences Centre. Before being sentenced, Patriquen had requested that the sentencing be delayed until a Charter challenge was heard concerning the stated inability of the Corrections Service and Health Canada to insure that his prescribed course of treatment would be available to him for the duration of that sentence. Hood ruled that Patriquen's rights hadn't been violated because he had yet to begin serving his sentence. Only then, when he was deprived of access to cannabis, could there be evidence proving his rights had been denied. On this technicality, Hood denied Patriquen the right to make a Charter challenge, stating that it was a matter of civil law between Corrections Canada and Patriquen. Clearly, it was a matter of federal law that should have been dealt with then. Upon arriving at the prison, Patriquen was denied access to all treatment for his first 10 days in custody. During that time, he lost more than 10 pounds of body weight. When he was finally offered a minimal pain remedy, it was in the form of a treatment already dismissed as ineffectual by both Health Canada and the QEII. Under Canadian law, Patriquen has the Charter right to pursue a legitimately prescribed course of treatment, even though imprisoned. However, it is currently illegal to provide him with his approved medication while in a federal institution. Consequently, an apparent conflict of laws arises. The Patriquen Relief Group has an online petition (at http://www.railroaded.info/), and is requesting that the justice minister review this case and, in the interim, confine Patriquen to supervised house arrest, where he could resume his legally prescribed and federally exempted regiment of treatment. Though not yet widely publicized, this petition has, to date, garnered several hundred signatures. Wayne Phillips Hamilton - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom