Pubdate: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 Source: Trail Daily Times (CN BC) Copyright: 2002 Trail Daily Times Contact: http://www.canada.com/trail/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1043 Author: Hubert Beyer Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mjcn.htm (Cannabis - Canada) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/decrim.htm (Decrim/Legalization) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/bush.htm (Bush, George) POT REPORT RIGHT ON THE MARK Canada's unelected Senate, a body not generally known for cutting-edge policy insights, released a report recently that is as astonishing as it is worthwhile. Legalize marijuana, the 600-page report advises the federal government. Canada's marijuana laws, it states, are wasting resources, both financial and human, infringe on civil liberties and do absolutely nothing to stop people from using it. The critics immediately manned the barricades. Stephen Harper, the Canadian Alliance leader, opined that, as a parent, he is sceptical of the premise that alcohol is more harmful than marijuana, another of the report's observations. The ruling Liberals were too absorbed in the succession-to-the-throne warfare to offer any meaningful response, which is a pity, since they're the ones who could act on the senate's recommendations. Meanwhile various newspapers positioned themselves squarely on the editorial fence, saying that perhaps decriminalization was the answer rather than outright legalization. Seems to me that would nothing in terms of freeing resources for more important things than hunting down and charging marijuana users, only to see them get a small fine. I don't know whether it's important in this context to say that I don't use the stuff, but I know a lot of people who do, some of them in positions that would surprise you. The problem with our marijuana laws is that they are lumped in with other drugs. And it is the United States that did the lumping. For decades now, the U.S. has been waging a most disastrous war on drugs. It has cost billions, destroyed lives, ruined countries and is no closer to being won then when it started. The war on drugs will only be won when the profit potential is removed. And while it is perhaps politically wise not to legalize all drugs, including heroin and cocaine, it would be desirable. But failing that, legalizing marijuana would be the next-best thing. The most often cited argument against legalization is that it would increase consumption, when in fact it doesn't. Americans consumed no less alcohol during Prohibition than before or after. The senate report observes that regarding the use of cannabis among the young that "we have not legalized cannabis, and we have one of the highest rates (of usage) in the world. "Countries adopting a more liberal policy have, for the most part, rates of usage lower than ours, which stabilized after a short period of growth." Legalization of drugs, on the other hand, has enormous potential. If the profit accruing to criminal organizations is removed, users will not have to resort to crime to feed their habit. The greatest percentage of property crime is directly linked to drug use. This is why decriminalization is a half-measure that will not achieve anything. While those caught with marijuana will get away with the equivalent of a traffic fine, but not get a criminal record, the sale of cannabis will remain illegal, which means that distribution in the hands of criminal cartels will not be affected. According to the senate report, 90 per cent of spending related to drugs is spent on enforcement, leaving only 10 per cent for addiction treatment and the like. While legalization of all drugs might be a more constructive alternative to the war on drugs which is leading nowhere, it would probably also spell political suicide for the government implementing such a policy. Which makes it all the more important to do the possible as a first step: the legalization of marijuana. To be sure, the U.S. would be jumping up and down and perhaps even threaten certain economic sanctions, but hey, now is as good a time as any to tell Uncle Sam to take a hike with its war on drugs. For the next six to 12 months or so the Bush administration will be so busy getting rid of Saddam that it might not even notice what we're doing. - --- MAP posted-by: Jackl