Pubdate: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 Source: Free Press, The (NC) Copyright: 2002 Kinston Free Press Contact: http://www.kinston.com/Contact.cfm Website: http://www.kinston.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1732 PENTAGON SCALING BACK WAR ON DRUGS Americans are soon going to be getting more bang for their defense bucks. The Pentagon last week decided to reduce its role in the drug war in order to concentrate on the war on terrorism. While some will see this as a blow to the nation's anti-drug efforts, it reinforces the role of the military: defense of the country from attack. It's important to recall from time to time that the military is not merely a police force with secret high-tech gear and heavy weapons. Its troops are trained to fight and defeat a physical enemy, not one that does its damage in small, insidious ways. Although we're no fans of the drug war, a person would have to be unconscious not to see that drugs can do harm to users. But that doesn't mean fighting them is the role of the military, especially when our troops are needed for a real, rather than a metaphorical war. That's the reason the Pentagon is scaling back its participation in the drug war. With troops fighting in Afghanistan, training the Philippine army in counter-terrorism, and preparing for a possible invasion of Iraq, the United States needs every soldier, sailor, airman and Marine it has to prosecute the war on terrorism. The Pentagon got involved in the drug war in 1988 when Congress ordered military leaders into action to try to stem the flow of cocaine from South America. Fourteen years and billions of dollars later, almost every kid in America knows someone who knows someone who can sell you cocaine. That doesn't sound like a very successful war. Anyone with a grasp of simple economics is familiar with the law of supply and demand: when the supply of a product is high, the price goes down and vice versa. If the drug war, for all its ballyhooed drug confiscations, were successful, the prices would be so high as to be out of the reach of most users. Were that the case, our courts and jails wouldn't be full of people whose problems include drug use. One of the most expensive Pentagon missions in the drug war is training the Colombian army to battle the leftist rebels that sell protection to that country's drug lords. We hope that reducing our involvement there keeps us from becoming further entangled in a long civil war that has claimed thousands of lives and shows no signs of abating. Decisions by the Bush and Clinton administrations threaten to embroil the United States in that conflict - a civil war and drug war which often overlap, and have the same players. How are American soldiers supposed to discern the difference between the two? We hope that by reducing the military's role in the drug war, they don't have to try. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Stevens