Pubdate: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 Source: Times of South Mississippi, The (MS) Copyright: The Times of South Mississippi 2002 Contact: http://www.thetimeswire.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1950 Author: Robert Sharpe Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?159 (Drug Courts) DRUG COURTS METHODS ARE NOT COST EFFECTIVE Drug courts are definitely a step in the right direction, but an arrest should not be a necessary prerequisite for rehabilitation. Would alcoholics seek help for their illness if doing so were tantamount to confessing to criminal activity? Likewise, would putting every incorrigible alcoholic behind bars and saddling them with criminal records prove cost-effective? The United States recently earned the dubious distinction of having the highest incarceration rate in the world, with drug offenses accounting for the majority of federal incarcerations. This is big government at its worst. At an average cost of $25,071 per inmate annually, maintaining the world's largest prison system can hardly be considered fiscally conservative. The threat of prison that coerced treatment relies upon can backfire when it's actually put to use. Prisons transmit violent habits and values rather than reduce them. Minor drug offenders are eventually released, with dismal job prospects due to criminal records. Turning drug users into unemployable ex-cons is a senseless waste of tax dollars. Alcohol and tobacco are by far the deadliest recreational drugs, yet the government does not go out of its way to destroy the lives of drinkers and smokers. Imagine if every alcoholic were thrown in jail and given a permanent criminal record. How many lives would be destroyed? How many families torn apart? How many tax dollars would be wasted turning potentially productive members of society into hardened criminals? Sincerely, Robert Sharpe, M.P.A. Program Officer Drug Policy Alliance - --- MAP posted-by: Beth