Pubdate: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 Source: San Jose Mercury News (CA) Copyright: 2002 San Jose Mercury News Contact: http://www.sjmercury.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/390 Author: Fox Butterfield, New York Times CRIME-FIGHTING COST: $147 BILLION The cost of combating crime in the United States, for police, prisons and courts, was $147 billion in 1999, the last year for which figures are available, according to a study released Sunday by the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics. That is more than four times the $36 billion spent on the criminal justice system in 1982. Federal, state and local spending for police, prisons and courts continued to increase every year in the 1990s, even as crime fell. Nearly 2.2 million people now work in the criminal justice system, including 1 million police officers, 717,000 prison and jail guards and 455,000 people in the courts, the report said. The spending amounts to 7.7 percent of all state and local government spending and are about the same as government spending on hospitals and health care. The report did not address the question of how effective the spending has been. But it did find that, in general, crime rates and spending on criminal justice were related, though not in the way many people believe. "States with high crime rates tend to have higher than average expenditures and employment" devoted to criminal justice, the report said, while states with the lowest crime rates tend to have the lowest spending and employment. Three of the top four areas in spending on criminal justice per capita were California, the District of Columbia and Alaska, all with high crime rates, the report said. But the five states with the lowest spending per capita on criminal justice were South Dakota, Maine, Vermont, North Dakota and West Virginia, which are among the states with the lowest crime rates. "You can't assume that because you spend more money that you are going to drive down crime," said Michael Jacobson, a professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice and a former corrections and probation commissioner and deputy budget director for New York City. "That is a simplistic assumption." The question now, Jacobson said, is whether the fiscal crisis facing almost all states will force policymakers to confront the costs of using prisons to lock up an ever increasing number of people. "In the 1990s, when states were flush with cash, they could do everything," Jacobson said. They could cut taxes and build more prisons, he said, adding that prisons have been the fastest-growing item in state budgets. "But now they must make hard choices, and with crime already going down, they must put a price on prisons." Several states, including Ohio and Michigan, have already closed prisons in the past few months as a result of budget shortfalls, and some other states, including Washington, are considering reversing tough sentencing laws passed in the 1990s, so that inmates will serve shorter terms and the pressure for prison bed space will be reduced. The report also highlights the federal government's increased role in the last two decades in criminal justice, which before then had been regarded more as a local or state function, said Alfred Blumstein, a professor of criminal justice at Carnegie Mellon University. Federal spending on criminal justice jumped to $27.4 billion in 1999, up from $4.5 billion in 1982, the report found. That is a greater increase than those in state and local spending. The biggest proportion of the increase in federal spending was for prisons, as Congress moved to make more crimes federal crimes, particularly drug offenses, and lengthened sentences. - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake