Pubdate: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 Source: Badger Herald (WI) Copyright: 2002 Badger Herald Contact: http://www.badgerherald.com/about/contact_staff.shtml Website: http://www.badgerherald.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/711 Authors: Clifford A. Schaffer, Austin King, Ray Carlson Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v02/n272/a03.html?1449 Note: Title by mapinc editor RESEARCH, RACE, AND MORE RESEARCH If you are going to report on the issue of marijuana's potential addictiveness ("Studies Show Marijuana may be Addictive," Feb. 15), at least give all the facts. The article states "scientists at the National Institute on Drug Abuse found monkeys would voluntarily give themselves THC in amounts similar to those inhaled by people who smoke marijuana. Self-administration of drugs by animals is perceived to be a trademark of addictive substances." The truth is the only way the NIDA scientists could get monkeys to self-administrate THC was to get them seriously addicted to cocaine first. The monkeys were going through cocaine withdrawal. Is it any wonder that an animal going through cocaine withdrawal would want another drug to alleviate the suffering? Clifford A. Schaffer, Director, DRCNet Online Library of Drug Policy - --- Canyon Country, CA ----- This evening, City Council will debate and vote on renewal of the controversial Anti-Loitering Ordinance it passed some years back. This ordinance allows police to search and harass people hanging out in a "known drug area" or speaking with "known drug users or dealers." Sounds pretty draconian, right? It gets worse. As you might suspect, "known drug areas" are black neighborhoods, and "known drug users or dealers" tend to be black people. In this city, which is over 90 percent white, 90 percent of the victims of this ordinance have been people of color. When asked to explain the disparate impact of the ordinance, Police Chief Dick Williams said, "Frankly, I don't know of any white drug dealers in Madison." Frankly, that's one of the most racist things I've heard since coming to school here, and it is that very mindset which explains why being black is still a crime in our great city. Austin King, UW junior - --- I challenge the "scientific study" showing marijuana's addictive properties ("Studies Show Marijuana may be Addictive," Feb. 15). All of the other studies I have seen, including the 1972 Shaffer Commission and the 1998 IOM report, do not support the claim that marijuana is addictive. Furthermore, the "symptoms" described in the article above are not necessarily those of addiction. For instance, "loss of appetite" after the cessation of marijuana consumption notes merely the absence of the substance's appetite-stimulating effects. I would suggest that responsible publications cite names of studies and possible links to evidence. This is an old, refuted legend that keeps appearing in "studies" that quickly are shown to be lacking in evidence and/or scientific method. May I suggest as well that those reading the Herald also take a look at a book entitled, Marijuana Myths Marijuana Facts: A Review Of The Scientific Evidence (Lynn Zimmer, John P. Morgan; Paperback). This issue is far too important and controversial for people to ignore. Ray Carlson, Redwood City, CA - --- MAP posted-by: Josh