Pubdate: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 Source: Birmingham News (AL) Copyright: 2002 The Birmingham News Contact: http://www.al.com/bhamnews/bham.html Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/45 Jail Deadline STATE MUST PAY FOR PRISON PROGRAMS TO AFFORD PAYING FINES Prison crowding is a problem that won't go away in Alabama. It can't, not anytime soon at least. There simply are too many prisoners, not enough prison space and too little money. Prison officials find themselves facing another, potentially expensive deadline: Remove all state inmates from county jails by April 1 or be hit by court fines, possibly $26 a day for each inmate in jail longer than 30 days. With 320 state prisoners sitting past that limit in county jails throughout the state which, by the way, is a big improvement over the 2,000 this time last year the already money-strapped prison system could be forced to pay out $250,000 a month. Needless to say, the state doesn't have that kind of money to lose. It's a perfect example of pay now, or pay more later. Over the years, the state has negligently underfunded state prisons. So much so, that a prison system built to house 10,000 prisoners is crammed with more than 26,000 inmates. The prisons are so full that they cannot take all the newly convicted prisoners from county jails. Only a court order, backed up by the threat of hefty fines, prompted Gov. Don Siegelman and state prison officials to take action last year to relieve the backlog in jails. Siegelman's plan was aimed at reducing prison crowding, in large part, by directing more inmates into drug treatment, community work and other alternative programs. That approach makes sense because it frees prison space for violent criminals by redirecting some nonviolent criminals. What's needed even more, though, is a comprehensive review of the state's prison and sentencing systems. Fortunately, that's what the Alabama Sentencing Commission is doing. Unfortunately, it hasn't finished its work. Last month, commission members asked the state Legislature for another year, more money and more access to criminal records to complete its job. But that doesn't erase the deadline the state is facing. Plus, a bill aimed at curbing abuses of the state parole board by mandating that certain violent criminals serve at least 85 percent of their sentence before they can be paroled would add to the crowding problem. The short-term solution is for the state to speed up implementing its alternative programs. It can do that by making sure the money is there to pay for them. The choice is clear: Pay now or pay more later. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth