Pubdate: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 Source: Eagle, The (DC) Website: http://www.eagle.american.edu/ Feedback: http://www.eagle.american.edu/section.cfm/48/5/0/1 Address: American University, Mary Graydon 227, 4400 Massachusetts, Ave., N.W., Washington, DC 20016 Copyright: 2002 The Eagle Author: Adam Choka Note: Adam Choka is a senior in the School of Public Affairs. Related: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v02/n332/a09.html Related: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v02/n389/a09.html WE (SHOULD ALL) STILL WANT ANSWERS One Month After The Drug Raid, Questions, Doubts, And Rumors Still Remain It has been almost four weeks since the "Great AU Drug Bust of 2002," as the Eagle itself dubbed the incident in which more than twenty MPD officers stormed the dorms, with their guns drawn, ransacked several dorm rooms, and arrested 6 students ("We Want Answers," 4 March 2002). And almost four weeks after this significant event, AU officials have failed to clarify the university's involvement in the investigation, and have made little or no effort to settle the many questions surrounding the drug raid. Perhaps this failure on the part of university officials is due, in part, to the general lack of visible student concern over the incident, but some members of the university community still want answers, are concerned, and justifiably so. From the very first statement released by AU--on the morning after the raid--we have been provided with unclear, ambiguous information as to the university's role in the raid, and in the one to two month undercover investigations that preceded it. In this initial statement, we were told that AU had "been supporting" and "working with" MPD "in their work to make the campus a safer place for everyone." The Washington post reported that AU had knowledge of the police investigation before the day of the raid. In the school's second statement, for some reason not released until 3:10 p.m. on the day after the raid, AU reiterated the message that the university would "cooperate with police officials on these matters." Spokesmen for MPD also made sure to stress the university's cooperation, and it was not until the Saturday following the raid that reports that the entire investigation had been initiated by university officials began to surface. While supporting MPD, working with MPD, and cooperating with MPD are not wholly inconsistent with initiating an MPD investigation, we should be concerned about misinformation provided by the university regarding it's possible complicity in allowing tactical-vice units to raid the dorms in such an aggressive, coercive manner. Indeed, if the university had actually initiated the investigation, presumably because AU officials were concerned about the safety of the campus community, then it is troubling that the school was less than forthright about this fact. If the school was worried by drug use on campus, and concerned for the safety of the students, we must wonder why university officials attempted no other interventions before they sanctioned the assault on the dorms. We must wonder, also, why "all that" Ben Ladner knew after the raid was "that there had been an investigation under way," as the Eagle quoted the man-in-charge as saying. Ultimately, there is no reason that the Great AU Drug Raid needed to occur. The Eagle was right in pointing out that, because "there remains so many unanswered questions that it is awfully difficult...to come to a conclusion one way or the other on the whole affair." Perhaps that is precisely what the university wants, for the AU community to be unable to come to an informed conclusion, as this would explain the lack of answers provided by university officials almost one whole month after the raid. We must recognize, while remembering that some students were forced to suffer through this highly traumatic experience and were not arrested, that the same results could have been achieved by less violent, more justifiable means. Given that this investigation, like all drug investigations as the police work their way up the supply chain, is ongoing and continuing, it would be imprudent to allow this incident to fade from our memories, to allow the many significant questions that still remain to go unanswered. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth