Pubdate: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 Source: Gaston Gazette, The (NC) Copyright: 2002 The Gaston Gazette Contact: http://www.gast-gazette.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1702 Author: San Francisco Chronicle Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/youth.htm (Youth) ROUNDING UP ALL JUST TO FIND THE FEW Take a look around your local high school. That cheerleader, the head of the chorus, or that member of the debate club: Isn't it time the kids in after-school activities were drug tested? If this approach sounds crazy, then you should be worried about a case before the U.S. Supreme Court. An Oklahoma school district wants to test all students in competitive extracurricular groups in the name of stamping out drugs. Never mind that such activities attract students who are far less likely to be dopers. Don't dwell on the dehumanizing effects of urine testing of youngsters. Forget the mad-rush mentality to rein in a problem that may not exist. In broader terms, the wholesale drug testing goes against the notion of individual rights. The Fourth Amendment bars unreasonable searches and seizures, and the high school drug tests surely fail this test. According to the proposed policy, it's not the groggy, red-eyed kid who should be examined, it's everyone in the school band. Equally disturbing was the pro-testing mindset of the high court shown during oral arguments last week. The justices asked: With drug use rising, shouldn't a school board be allowed a free hand? A prior high court ruling allowed drug screening for athletes, and testing other kids in after-school activities wasn't any different, several justices suggested. Besides, high school students are minors, not entitled to adult privacy rights, it was argued. If a majority of the Supreme Court agrees with these contentions, it could have dangerous consequences. In the name of drugs - or possibly other objectionable activities - schools can round up everyone to find the few. - --- MAP posted-by: Terry Liittschwager