Pubdate: Thu, 10 Apr 2003
Source: Chronicle, The (NC Edu)
Copyright: 2003 The Chronicle, Box 90858, Durham, N.C. 27708 This publication m
Contact: http://www.chronicle.duke.edu/contactus.php
Website: http://www.chronicle.duke.edu/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2269
Author: Nathan Carleton

Getting Down To Business

POT, PROTESTORS AND PRESIDENTS

I thought I was going to make it through the whole year without a rant. Sorry.

- Everyone knows by now that J.J. Redick got busted for smoking weed last 
week. Sorry. Everyone knows by now that J.J. Redick was, according to a 
police report, caught with "red, glossy eyes and a strong smell of 
marijuana about" his "person" in a room that smelled like marijuana and 
contained a bong "with pieces of green leafs in the water and a strong 
smell of marijuana emitting from the top." I'm not sure what rules or laws 
Redick violated, nor am I sure what punishment his actions warrant. What I 
am sure of, however, is that he should not have been in the room. Yes, most 
college students have smoked before. And yes, Redick probably wouldn't do 
something that he thought would affect his performance on the court. But 
there is a bigger issue here.

Redick, who is on scholarship, is a star of one of the most respected and 
visible basketball programs in the nation. Thousands of American children 
admire him. Like it or not, everything he does will be noticed and, in many 
cases, emulated. He and his teammates definitely need to be a lot more 
careful in the future, because most fans would rather that others 
associated Duke basketball with classy players like Grant Hill and Shane 
Battier than individuals who push referees, get named in a possible rape 
case, beat their girlfriends, shove other coaches and use illegal drugs.

- It should be clear to almost anyone who has watched the news recently 
that those in the "no blood for oil" movement were dead wrong with most of 
their predictions about "the next Vietnam." But it is now also clear that 
they possess disturbingly low amounts of respect and maturity. The stunt 
that Yousuf Al-Bulushi, Jessica Rutter and about two dozen others pulled at 
last week's Duke Student Government meeting crossed too many lines to 
count. Asking a student government to consider a matter of international 
policy is one thing. But storming into their meeting to chant - about a 
decision they reached after debate - until they call recess is quite 
another. Let's face it, the tactics employed by the protesters last 
Thursday were not even slightly resemblant of intellectual discourse.

They reminded of me of a time earlier this semester when Al-Bulushi invited 
me to speak on a student panel about the war. I thought that he could put 
his biases aside while organizing it and agreed to represent the Duke 
Conservative Union at the event. He proved me wrong, however, and stacked 
the panel. The five-person "lineup" included a representative from Duke 
Democrats (who had previously said that the war was being waged in part to 
acquire oil); someone speaking for Students Against the War; a member of 
Students Against Sweatshops (read anti-war); and, referred to as the 
"Wesley Fellowship representative," "Peaceville" organizer Dave Allen. I 
told Al-Bulushi that I saw no reason why SAS or Wesley Fellowship needed to 
be represented at a panel about war with Iraq and suggested that he either 
uninvite them or include more speakers. I'm not sure what he did after 
that. Hopefully he realized that the group probably wasn't balanced enough 
to legitimately discuss a war that, at last check, only 16 percent of 
Americans say we shouldn't have waged.

- Individuals speaking about DSG President Joshua Jean-Baptiste are 100 
percent correct in contending that his "character and credibility" have 
been "placed in jeopardy," and that he has "already been convicted in the 
court of public opinion." They are completely incorrect, however, in 
attributing this to The Chronicle's alleged negligence and/or racial 
irresponsibility in reporting his arrest.

Quite simply, the reason that Jean-Baptiste's character has been questioned 
is that he was arrested. I highly doubt that anyone casually read of his 
arrest and assault charges for participating in what the police basically 
described as a three versus one beatdown and then lowered his or her 
opinion of him only after hearing the testimony of a supposed eyewitness.

Neither Jean-Baptiste nor his spokesperson should be pointing fingers at 
anyone, at least until they explain to the student body why their president 
was arrested for assaulting a person who that night was treated for serious 
injuries. The March 31 article and the reaction that followed are exactly 
what one should expect in the wake of a violent beating and subsequent 
arrest of a major University's student body president - regardless of his 
skin color.

Nathan Carleton is a Trinity sophomore. His column appears regularly.