Pubdate: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 Source: Bergen Record (NJ) Copyright: 2003 Bergen Record Corp. Contact: http://www.bergen.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/44 Author: John Curran Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/af.htm (Asset Forfeiture) N.J. SEEKS DELAY ON BAN OF SPLITTING COP LOOT ATLANTIC CITY - Citing potential administrative nightmares, the state asked a judge Thursday to delay enforcement of a ruling that bans police and prosecutors from sharing the loot seized in civil forfeiture cases. Last month, Superior Court Judge G. Thomas Bowen declared the practice unconstitutional after a challenge by a former Cumberland County sheriff's deputy whose 1990 Ford Thunderbird was seized by the state because her teenage son had been caught selling marijuana from it. The state will appeal the Dec. 11 ruling to the Appellate Division within two weeks, according to John Hagerty, spokesman for the state Division of Criminal Justice. In the meantime, the property seized by authorities has been thrown into limbo, since it can no longer be distributed to police and prosecutors, Deputy Attorney General Linda Danielson said in a letter brief filed in Bowen's court in Salem County. Much is at stake: Between 1998 and 2000, the state seized about $25 million in such cases, distributing it among police and prosecutors in all 21 counties. Without a stay, the owners of seized property would flood courts seeking return of the items and reparations, Danielson said. What's more, if the state were to rearrange its procedures for handling civil forfeitures and a higher court were to later reverse Bowen's ruling, money would be needlessly wasted, she said. "Whether their claims are successful or not, judicial and prosecutorial resources will need to be expended entertaining such contentions," Danielson said. Carol Thomas, 45, of Millville, who was never charged in the criminal case after her son was caught selling marijuana from her car, says the state's system for letting police and prosecutors keep what they seize from criminals or suspects amounts to legalized bounty hunting. Bowen agreed in his ruling, saying the potential profit for law enforcement officials taints their motive in seizing the property. The state wants a higher court to rule now. "This court has decided an issue of great constitutional magnitude and has invalidated, on a relatively untested legal theory, a statutory provision found in both the federal statute and the statutes of many other states," Danielson said. Bowen didn't immediately rule on the stay request Thursday. - --- MAP posted-by: Josh