Pubdate: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 Source: Poughkeepsie Journal (NY) Copyright: 2003 Poughkeepsie Journal Contact: http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1224 FIX THE STATE DRUG LAWS NOW Each year around this time, Gov. George Pataki offers more compelling evidence why the state's drug laws must change. Yet he and lawmakers can never break the impasse leading to those changes. It's disgraceful. So, every year, we have this annual rite of passage -- a chosen few drug offenders locked up in the state's overcrowded prison are granted clemency by Pataki. There were three of them this holiday season, including Green Haven inmate Eric Marsh, who received his degree from Marist College through a program that has been cut by the state. Deemed a model prisoner, Marsh also created a program to teach math to other inmates at Green Haven. Good for him. But what about the 10,000 other inmates who officials like State Chief Administrative Judge Jonathan Lippman say would be better served in treatment programs than in jail? Those inmates languish because the governor and Legislature can't agree on precisely how to loosen the drug laws, even though they all agree those laws are too stringent and inflexible. Marsh's case provides a good example why changes are necessary. Marsh, a first-time offender, was sentenced to 15 years to life in prison, the mandatory punishment for being convicted of selling two ounces of cocaine or more. Marsh maintains his innocence and refused to plead guilty to a lesser offense. He was convicted at trial, and, under the Rockefeller drug laws, the judge could not take into account that it was Marsh's first conviction. Sentencing someone potentially to life in prison under these circumstances is crazy. Rapists and those found guilty of manslaughter can get lighter sentences in New York. Treatment Often More Effective Since these drug laws were created in the early 1970s under Gov. Rockefeller, the state has built 51 prisons, and the number of inmates has swelled from 12,500 to more than 70,000. Supervised parole and treatment programs would be a better way to handle thousands of nonviolent drug offenders. It certainly would be more cost-effective for taxpayers. Drug treatment can cost less than $15,000 a year for each offender; incarceration, twice that. Traditionally, the Democratic-controlled Assembly wants broader reforms than either the Republican governor or the GOP-controlled Senate are willing to support. But they all agree on certain revisions, such as doing away with mandatory minimums -- the excessive sentences given in cases like Marsh's. Instead, judges should be given far more discretion to decide appropriate sentences; common sense dictates that whether someone is a first-time or repeat offender should be taken into account. The state's drug laws have proven unfair and ineffective. A different approach is needed. They have debated these injustices for too long. It's time they did something about them. - --- MAP posted-by: Beth