Pubdate: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 Source: Vancouver Sun (CN BC) Copyright: 2003 The Vancouver Sun Contact: http://www.canada.com/vancouver/vancouversun/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/477 Author: Barry Joneson Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?142 (Safe Injecting Rooms) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/hr.htm (Harm Reduction) DRUG TREATMENT CENTRES SHOULD BE THE PRIORITY The Jan. 4 article "Safe injection sites will draw key users" says only 37 per cent of the addicts surveyed were interested in using a safe injection site. It seems like an awful lot of money to spend on an initiative that the large majority of intravenous drug users have no interest in supporting. The reality is that all addicts, whether they use safe injection sites or not, will still have to use whatever means they are using now to buy drugs. Safe injection sites will do nothing to alleviate the crime problem associated with drugs. According to statistics by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, there were 181 overdose deaths in 1999 despite all the money being spent on harm reduction initiatives. That was a decrease from the early 1990s, but overdose deaths in Vancouver are also down from what they were then when strong heroin was on the market. Addicts who have used safe injection sites told me they were convenient because the dealers were close by. They could push the envelope on how high they could get because they knew someone would be there to revive them. Proponents have stated the sites will bring addicts into contact with health services that will help them get into treatment. Do they not realize we don't have enough beds for those who would like to go into treatment now? As a recovering addict who has talked to many other addicts in recovery, particularly those who were IV drug users, one thing is clear. By the time one gets to a point of shooting drugs regularly, they are very aware of what services are available. The only thing that can help them to change their life is desire -- and that has to come from within. Addicts in recovery tell me that is a largely attainable goal with supportive treatment. The question comes down to whether taxpayers want to fund programs that enable drug use. If a loved one was drug addicted, would you rather there be an adequate treatment support system or would you rather the money be spent on programs that caretake them while they continue to destroy their lives using drugs? Barry Joneson Burnaby - --- MAP posted-by: Beth