Pubdate: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 Source: Lindsay Daily Post (CN ON) Copyright: 2003 Lindsay Daily Post Contact: http://www.thepost.ca/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2333 Author: Brian M. Grummitt HEMP INDUSTRY WOULD BENEFIT FROM POT DECRIMINALIZATION Editorial - Re: 'Majority of Canadians want to decriminalize pot possession, poll' (Jan. 4, The Daily Post). Could we not, for the sake of argument, divide 'decriminalization of marijuana' into three areas of conversation: Agricultural - due to the stereotyping of all hemp causing 'reefer madness', the Americans prevented non-the producing strains of hemp to be a crucial agricultural crop. They annihilated the prosperous hemp industry in their own country. Did you know the original blue jeans were sewn from recycled hemp sailcloth? The nautical world swore by hemp rope, and hemp sails adorned those three mast schooners. Watch a show called 'Hemp Revolution' aired by PBS if you want to realize all the agricultural benefits of hemp. The point is, an American administration caused the loss of thousands of jobs plus untold dollars in agricultural and manufacturing/engineering economical prosperity by their unsubstantiated propaganda campaign 'Reefer Madness'. I've seen the film. Ask Australia, Sweden and many other countries about the rejuvenation of hemp industries. The U.S.A. have actually prevented documented cases of physically ill citizens from taking marijuana as a medically recommended drug to ease their problems. And not just chronically ill people either! Glaucoma victims who could have prevented blindness, stroke victims like myself who could use the neurological benefits provided by reefers. And Toronto law enforcement shut down the operation that provided 1,200 ill patients receiving medicine that actually let them live instead of just existing! Existing laws are doing more damage than good in our medical communities. This I believe is the most controversial part of the marijuana issue. If recreational smoking was allowed as it should be (until you can prove without a shadow of a doubt that it would cause more damage than good in medicinal terms), the only real difference to society will be that we pot smokers will legally grow our own - 12 plants a year, just enough for our own use. You won't get increased crime rate, or increased mental institute expenses. But you may want to buy stocks in the munchie suppliers. Dopeheads over obnoxious alcohol drinkers any day! Give dopeheads equal rights as valium and other tranquilizer takers (did someone mention drug companies? Oh my, you bad little chap!) To cap off my recitation here, I would like to re-enforce the words that I, myself, read on these very pages: Let statistical and factual data determine the issue, and not personal opinions! And that is the end of my personal opinion based on statistical, factual data! The last point of personal irritation in the article was the quoted American reference threat: with 'reefer madness', which was the American propaganda program created to obscure of factual information of marijuana. True story! And it wouldn't be like the American capitalistic pharmaceutical firms to help out if their profits were at risk? No, not them! I look at the U.S. like this: They are mere mortals and therefore they do make mistakes! But just like dealing with seniors, get them to admit it. Great, loyal neighbours. Like Canada, their administrations have not always governed as their citizens would sometimes prefer. They can teach anyone a thing or two about patriotism. They are unquestionably the masters of presentation and illusion. They have many outstanding features and some not-so-outstanding ones. Their administrations however, paint a different picture to the world. In general, I believe the majority of our southern neighbours are peace-loving, down to earth, caring, intelligent, responsible, loving people. So why do their administrations continue to emit arrogant, war-monger, unintelligent vibrations to the rest of the world? Let's put it this way: Any country which still allows Klu Klux Klan chapters to exist, and which still is won't move for medicinal reasons on an outdated zero tolerance drug policy, is quite simply not worthy of my or my country's respect. Therefore, I suggest we take what the Americans say about any current issues with more than a few grains of salt. Threats or no threats! Brian M. Grummitt Daytonia Beach - --- MAP posted-by: Beth