Pubdate: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 Source: Gleaner, The (Henderson, KY) Copyright: 2003 The E.W. Scripps Co Contact: http://www.thegleaner.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1634 Note: Requires 'Letter to editor' in the subject line of e-mail Author: Beth Smith TEEN DRUG COURT: OFFICIALS ORGANIZING NEW APPROACH REHABILITATION They don't want to "reinvent the wheel," but they do want to redirect kids toward a better future. A panel of 10 people, including individuals with the school system and court officials, is working to establish a teen drug court in Henderson County. Teen drug court is rehabilitation program that takes young people between the ages of 13 and 17 who have been charged with a crime and offers them a chance to learn how to live a drug-free life and to expunge their record. To participate, a juvenile must meet certain criteria, including a recorded history of alcohol and substance abuse, no violent offenses, no charges involving firearms and no sex offenses, said Henderson District Judge Rob Wiederstein. Between 10 and 20 teens will be chosen to start the program, which is being modeled after programs used in adult drug courts. "There's no question that adult drug courts have been more successful then anything else we have," said Wiederstein, who noted Henderson lacks an adult drug court. The idea of a teen drug court was presented to Wiederstein by the Kentucky Administrative Office of the Courts about a year and a half ago. "They said if you're interested, then you have to go through training workshops and organize 10 people to go with you," Wiederstein said. Another requirement is that certain professions had to be represented: A prosecutor, a judge, public defender, a statistician, someone from the school system, a drug treatment provider and someone in law enforcement. Finally, the group will have to apply for federal funding in February. Wiederstein said if Henderson doesn't get the grant -- which would hopefully include enough money to hire a drug court coordinator -- it would make it that much more difficult to establish a drug court. "If we don't get the grant, we'll have to sit down as a team and ask ourselves if we want to move forward," he said. Members of the drug court panel include Henderson County Schools social worker Rhonda Gillham, Kentucky Cabinet for Families and Children social worker Jamie Hargiss, University of Kentucky assistant professor Matthew Hiller, who works at the school's Center for Drug and Alcohol Research; Department of Juvenile Justice supervisor Kim Jackson, Henderson County public defender Ginger Massamore, Involvement Inc. director Bob Mitchell, Henderson County Attorney Charlie McCollom, Methodist Hospital social worker David Solomon, Henderson Police Officer Tony Fanok and Wiederstein. All but Hiller work from offices in Henderson. This group spent several weeks in seminars, Wiederstein said, "learning about teen-agers, what they think, what motivates them to try drugs and how we can get them off of them." The drug court system traditionally starts out with a phase that involves "intensive court supervision," Wiederstein said. As the teen graduates to the next level, court appearances are scaled back until the final phase when the youth comes only about once a month. "The idea is to only supervise what they need you to," Wiederstein said. In the initial phase, juveniles would make an appearance once a week in drug court where reports from their group counselors and/or individual counselors would be heard, he said. Also, an account of how the student is doing in school would be presented by a representative of the school, and the parents would be in attendance. At some point during each week of the first phase of drug court, the teen would be submit to a drug screening. "In drug court, when a kid becomes a part of it they give up certain rights," Wiederstein said. So if a teen tests positive for drugs the punishment could be as severe as a few days in a juvenile facility. If that's the discipline the panel agrees on, Wiederstein said, "they're going right then. No trial." But discipline is only one facet of drug court. "We're focusing on the kids' strengths, too," he said. "Praising these kids when they do well. Finding out what they're good at and amplifying it." Additionally, Wiederstein said "we make sure they get treatment. No one can use the excuse there's no money." Wiederstein said the panel would be actively involved in each teen's case by meeting once a week to discuss what sanctions, privileges or guidance the young person needs. Another positive aspect of drug court would be the mandated involvement of parents or legal guardians. "If the parent commitment is not very high, then the chances of a kid getting into the program aren't very good," Wiederstein said. "Because parent involvement is a leading factor to success, we're looking at having parents do group therapy with other parents. And (maybe) having these parents discuss car pooling and combining any other resources they may have." Panel members Kim Jackson and David Solomon say the parent participation in teen drug court is a major selling point for them. "The biggest shortcoming in drug treatment is parent participation" or lack thereof, Solomon said. "In drug court, the family is involved," Jackson said. "So a child just can't volunteer (for the program). The family has to volunteer," Solomon said. Jackson, who works with the Department of Juvenile Justice, said she is excited about the "intensiveness of the program. And having the weekly contact with the kids." Solomon, a social worker through Methodist Hospital, says he is hopeful but slightly skeptical. "Adolescent substance abuse treatment is in its infancy," Solomon said. "The whole field is scrambling to get information on what works." Solomon said "the old ways" or the traditional 12-step program don't work for treating most teens who abuse drugs. "So drug court, I hope, will help us introduce a non-traditional approach to treatment," he said. "My concern is not reinventing the wheel. Not doing the same old thing." But, he said, "I'm very hopeful. We want to help kids that maybe in the end have tried everything the current system can do and these kids got left behind. "Drug court breaks down the system walls and the policy walls each agency has that can cause the cracks that teens fall through," Solomon said. "Treatment needs to be different for kids," Jackson said. And, she said, "This approach (drug court) allows kids to be together and work the program together." "The people who help you the best are the ones who've been in the situation," Solomon said. "We have a long way to go," he said. "I think that teen drug court can help by customizing treatment for our community." "The team we work with is truly invested in kids," Solomon said. "We all know the problems and are aware of the problems. We all want to jump fences. We are excited about having a new opportunity." - --- MAP posted-by: Alex