Pubdate: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 Source: Timaru Herald (New Zealand) Copyright: 2003 Timaru Herald Contact: http://www.timaruherald.co.nz/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1039 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing) SAFETY FIRST Whether or not to allow random drug testing of employees, that is the question to be faced by the Employment Court as it hears a case brought by unions representing thousands of Air New Zealand staff. And it is a hearing that will be keenly watched by a number of industries. In the past five years, workplace drug testing by Environmental Science and Research has increased by 200 per cent, with 300 companies throughout the country now using the service. Main users, understandably enough, are industries involving higher-risk occupations. This is the case with Air New Zealand. It argues that safety of the flying public could be easily compromised if a person under the influence of alcohol or drugs is left undetected in their job. This makes sense. The thought of a drug-impaired worker being responsible for engine maintenance or giving the lead during on-flight safety arrangements is enough to send a shiver down the spine of any would-be traveller. If there is good reason for a test - in cases where safety is an issue and where there is evidence of drug or alcohol use - then random testing should apply. But no one wants the practice introduced on an ad hoc basis simply because it is the latest fashion from the United States or because of some misguided puritanical bent aimed at stamping out drinking and drug-taking among employees. So it is that the Employment Court has to decide how far safety considerations should outweigh the right of people to be in control of who can and cannot take blood and urine samples from their bodies. Clearly, in some cases at least, safety must come first. - --- MAP posted-by: Jay Bergstrom