Pubdate: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 Source: Ecologist, The (UK) Copyright: 2003 The Ecologist Page: 6 Issue: July/August Contact: http://www.theecologist.org/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/998 Author: Edward Hammond, Director, Cited: The Sunshine Project http://www.sunshine-project.org/ Referenced: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v03/n622/a09.html Bookmarks: http://www.mapinc.org/topics/Fusarium http://www.mapinc.org/topics/Plan+Colombia http://www.mapinc.org/colombia.htm HIDDEN AGENDA A letter from Or HC Evans in your May issue alleges that the Sunshine Project's campaign against the biological weapon Agent Green is 'propaganda', and that we have a 'sinister agenda' that Evans implies favours drug trafficking. Using the US Freedom of Information Act, the Sunshine Project has obtained a small mountain of US government documents on Agent Green. It includes Evans' own Agent Green research, paid for by the US government. Surely, Evans' personal involvement is why he has come forward so heatedly. Evans defends Agent Green by (falsely) claiming that it is safe and by conveniently ignoring the fact that it is illegal - development of biological agents with a hostile intent is prohibited by the Biological Weapons Convention. The US State Department has repeatedly said that drug eradication and counterinsurgency are inseparable in Colombia and yet it seeks to escalate this war with a biological agent that is more powerful than the currently-used chemical herbicides. The department intends to spray Agent Green from C135 military cargo aircraft not unlike those that blasted Vietnam with Agent Orange. The fungus formulation is designed to kill crops and establish persistent colonies of this dangerous pathogen across the world's second most biodiverse country. Agent Green is not specific to coca cultivars used to produce cocaine. It infects unrelated plants too (killing some). Evidence suggests that it kills related members of the genus Erythroxylum (there are more than 200, including four listed as endangered in Colombia). Evans' research did not consider impacts on indigenous peoples' traditional use of the plant and its relatives, nor did it test Agent Green on many crops grown in the region. Instead of focusing on plantains, cassava, coffee, cacao, palms, and dozens of other Colombian crops (including many in which Fusarium species are a problem) and uncultivated plants, Evans' group tested Agent Green on flax (linseed) and North American weeds - species uncommon or not present in the tropical South American ecosystems where coca is sown. No assessment was made of impacts on Colombian soil ecology. Or Evans and his allies are losing their bizarre fight for biological warfare. CABI Bioscience avoids the topic at United Nations meetings. The UK no longer supports the research. Former US President Clinton shelved plans to test Agent Green in Colombia. Biological control specialists in the Americas, Europe, and Africa have denounced Agent Green as a perversion of their science, which seeks ecological balance, not eradication and ecocide. Prodded by the US, the UN Drug Control Program (UNDCP) initially backed Agent Green; but when Kofi Annan ordered it to produce a reasoned response to government and activist criticisms, UNDCP could muster nothing adequate. It instead abandoned Agent Green because it is simply indefensible. It is sad commentary on the state of the international prohibition on biowarfare that Agent Green has advanced this far. Working with many other dedicated NGOs and indigenous peoples, the Sunshine Project is trying to permanently end this threat. Should Evans renew his bioweapons project, we and our partners will seek Crown prosecution under the UK's biological weapons law. Evans might think that is a I sinister agenda'; but we call it upholding the Biological Weapons Convention. Edward Hammond, Director, The Sunshine Project, Austin, USA - --- MAP posted-by: Richard Lake