Pubdate: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 Source: Daily News (KY) Copyright: 2003 News Publishing LLC Contact: http://www.bgdailynews.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/1218 Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/testing.htm (Drug Testing) Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/youth.htm (Youth) EDUCATION, TESTING HELP MAKE DRUG POLICIES EFFECTIVE While the Edmonson County School Board is right in trying to find and deal with students who are taking drugs, schools also must be aware that a policy that neglects to include education as part of their approach is incomplete. The board voted Monday to have outside agencies randomly test students in middle school and high school who are involved in extracurricular activities or who drive to school. The fact that the policy has been discussed for several months and has generally met with little resistance was reflected in the board's unanimous vote. A lack of strong resistance from parents shows that they likely are aware of a need for some kind of action to stem the tide of drugs in the school system. Support for the policy came from one of those parents - Kentucky State Police Trooper Scott Skaggs, who spoke out strongly in favor of a drug testing policy. Support from the law enforcement community, which in general is more aware of drug problems than most citizens, also carries a lot of weight when considering whether such policies will work. Some will argue that the policy will not have a great deterring effect because it limits testing to specific types of students; board Chairman Tommy Ritter is on record as saying most parents would like to see all students subjected to the test. However, he was told by board attorney Mike Owsley that doing so would probably not pass legal muster. Students in sports or other programs certainly are not immune to the temptation of drugs. However, it's likely that the greater struggle with drugs will be found among students who have no goals or other interests. Still, the symbolic effect of having a drug-testing policy is an important first step toward addressing the problem. However, research has shown that drug-testing policies alone have not proved to be effective in preventing drug use. A recent University of Michigan study of 722 secondary schools nationwide showed that testing students does not deter drug use. What is more likely to work is the threat of testing combined with the hard work of education, which can be greatly aided by Drug Abuse Resistance Education programs that have been specifically developed to communicate with and are especially effective with elementary school students. Along with teaching students to "just say no," why not give youngsters exposure to people willing to testify about the negative effects of drugs on their lives? Dealing with drugs in school is not an easy task for teachers, administrators or parents. Edmonson County should be commended for its symbolic stand by voting to implement testing as far as the law allows. By also emphasizing education about prevention, including powerful personal testimonies, the school board can add substance to its symbolism. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Seguin