Pubdate: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 Source: Times Record News (Wichita Falls, TX) Copyright: 2003 The E.W. Scripps Co. Contact: http://www.trnonline.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/995 Author: Ann Work MOST EDUCATORS NOT DRUG TESTED You know the bus driver who shuttles your child to school doesn't take drugs. But you can't say the same about your child's teacher. Even though pre-employment drug and alcohol testing has become a standard in the business world, local teachers and Midwestern State University professors are routinely hired without it. It's not a big enough issue to justify the cost, say education officials in both camps. But Wichita Falls City Manager Jim Berzina begs to differ. The pre-employment tests and the random testing of those already hired by the city is, unfortunately, necessary, he said. "Particularly when we bring in large groups, like for the police and fire academies, we have lost a lot of potential employees at the drug site. When we do the random tests, every now and then we find someone who doesn't pass." None of the 130 teachers hired this summer to help teach the district's 15,000 children in grades K-12 was given the drug and alcohol screening that is performed routinely on city and even Wichita County employees, according to WFISD Director of Legal Services David Gossom. Instead, new hires pass a criminal background check. Gossom cited one exception: The district tests any driver of a school vehicle. But that number is small, since school bus drivers are employees of Southwest Student Transportation and not the school district. As Southwest Student Transportation employees, bus drivers receive pre-employment testing and undergo random testing - the routine that is becoming common among businesses. At MSU, new hires pass a reference check. Criminal background checks are authorized only for sensitive positions, according to Board of Regents Chairman Mac Cannedy, Jr. No one in the schools or at MSU undergoes random drug testing, according to personnel officials. Cost is one reason, said WFISD's Gossom. The caliber of employees is another, he said. "We have to assume somewhere that they're of good character and that they're adults. If they've made it through college and the hiring process in general and have had good references, we feel they have enough judgment to know it's probably not a good idea (to take drugs or abuse alcohol)," he said. Most WFISD employees don't operate machinery or drive district vehicles, eliminating two obvious reasons to test for drugs, Gossom said. In the past, WFISD school board members have debated the issue of random drug tests for its athletes, but never for its teachers. The idea of testing athletes was dropped because of cost and the enormity of the task of administering tests in a truly random manner. WFISD Director of Athletics Ronnie Faulkner said he wouldn't mind seeing either group tested. "If we're going to take a stand, we need to be able to stand up on either side of it," he said. WFISD school board president Ken Hines pointed to the district's routine criminal background check as something that provides adequate hiring information about prospective teachers. "It probably catches a few people," he said. "If we could do a drug test, say $5 for employee applicants, it might be that we would do something more. I think the cost is a whole lot more than that." Since the district isn't aware of any problems with drug or alcohol abuse among its staff, the issue has never been raised, Hines said. "If we had a perception that we had a problem, we would at least look hard at it." The state regulatory agency for schools, the Texas Education Agency, wants districts to have exactly that freedom, said TEA general counsel David Anderson. Local districts may decide such hiring details for themselves, and no state statue requires the drug test safeguard. "Generally the state sets academic standards, funds the schools, sets the textbooks. The state does not get into who should be hired beyond certification requirements," Anderson said. TEA spokesperson DeEtta Culbertson said if a potential teacher had been convicted of a DWI (driving while intoxicated), a school district would find out about it through the criminal history check. The metropolitan Dallas ISD also chooses not to drug test, according to Dallas ISD spokesperson Donny Claxton. That doesn't mean there have never been problems, he said. "There have been incidents in the past where teachers have been arrested for involvement. But it's not an everyday reoccurring event." Instead, Dallas ISD runs criminal background checks on all teachers annually and expects principals to notice any signs of drug abuse while visiting teachers' rooms. City View school district also skips the drug test because no one's seen the need for it, said principal Steve Harris. "Around here, the folks you get? Pretty good people," he said. "Problems of that sort would be pretty obvious during the hiring interview." MSU personnel rely on the reference check as the safeguard when screening potential professors and university personnel. "No process, even if we were testing, would be perfect," said Cannedy. "We feel like we haven't had a problem. If someone develops a problem while they're employed, we do take steps to deal with it." County employees undergo a more rigorous application process. Pre-employment drug and alcohol screening is part of the hiring routine and so is a physical, said Caroline Aguilar in the county's human resources department. Depending on the job the prospect seeks, he may also have to pass a strength test, she said. Random drug testing is also standard procedure among heavy equipment workers, but not among the courthouse's clerical staff, said Judy Reinke, county auditor assistant. Wichita County pays $19,583.37 per month for all testing provided through its contract with Grace Medical. That covers testing of all jail inmates. "The city of Wichita Falls will do the random testing of employees for us at $31 each," Reinke said. The pre-employment drug tests are a given at some local businesses, including Coca-Cola Bottling. "No. 1 (reason we do it) is for safety," said Coca-Cola Human Resources Manager Algeria Brown, who hires from the Fort Worth office. "We operate the big rigs, fork lifts, we have merchandisers that move product out into the market and put it on the shelves. And it's our philosophy that we will have a drug-free workplace." Keeping the schools in step with business on this issue isn't crucial to Russell Bryant, Texas State Teachers Association regional president and a Ben Milam basic skills teacher. He's against the costly practice that could trigger false readings, he said. "A person who consistently uses drugs will begin to show signs in work performance, reliability, mood changes and other indicators that should raise a red flag to administration. From that point, action could be taken." Shelby Patrick, president-elect for the Wichita Falls Classroom Teachers Association and a Hirschi High School chemistry teacher, said such tests would jettison teacher morale. "Random drug testing would be a slap in the face to the trust bestowed on teachers," he said in an e-mail Friday. "The school building is already, by far, the safest place (children) can go. Why? It's because of the love and care that our teachers, administrators and all other workers provide every day." Patrick administered to a United States Air Force drug-testing program from its conception in 1971 until his retirement and said the process is complex. "To the random observer, one may see it as a black/white or a yes/no issue where easy answers can be obtained with minimal effort. It is not. You better think before you leap." Berzina said the city's testing, while required by the federal government in some areas, is still prudent for all his hiring candidates. "Most of the reason is, we want to make sure that we hire the best people we can for the work. Drug free is one of the best things possible." - --- MAP posted-by: Keith Brilhart