Pubdate: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 Source: Vanguard, The (AL Edu) Copyright: 2003 USA Vanguard Contact: http://www.usavanguard.com/ Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/2827 TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AT POT PROHIBITION Earlier this year, Webster Alexander was sentenced to 26 years in prison for selling four ounces of marijuana to an undercover police officer over the course of a month. He was no "drug kingpin"-the officer had to drive him to make the buys. He is now 19 years old. The offenses took place while Alexander was still in high school. Between then and his sentencing, Alexander graduated from high school, began community college and got a part-time job as a bricklayer. Now he's looking at 26 years in an Alabama prison with murderers and rapists who will likely be out long before him. Who is served by this sentence? Certainly not the public. Studies have shown that marijuana usage remains unaffected by the criminal penalties attached to its use. And we will now be footing the bill for his incarceration. Certainly not his family. For all the talk about how drugs destroy families, the only thing tearing this family apart is a 26-year sentence. Certainly not him. He was on his way to a better life. But now, he will be returned to society a convicted felon (we all know how good that looks on a job application) and ineligible for financial aid to finish his college degree. Timothy Coffman is also in prison in Alabama. His crime? Possession of a single joint. His sentence? Fifteen years. In California, "three strikes" laws have locked up more people for marijuana possession than for murder, rape and assault combined. In Montana, possession of a single plant can get you a life sentence. In an age when 35 percent of adults admit to having tried marijuana, it seems remarkably unjust to enforce such stiff penalties for use of a drug less harmful to individuals and to society than alcohol or tobacco. That's why the American Medical Association recommends decriminalization of marijuana. The governor of New Mexico goes even further; he wants outright legalization. Whatever the outcome of this ongoing debate, one thing is clear: the current laws are unjust and more harmful than the drug itself. Clearly, it is time for a change. - --- MAP posted-by: Larry Stevens